Do nuclear weapons even exist?
(i.ibb.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Lets say the danger hype was overstated. To what end? Wouldn't it be better for their industry if it was truly safe, could be demonstrated as such, and hence could be widespread without the concerns of meltdown, threat to nearby populations, and all that? Expressing needless danger is counter to their interests.
Japan is an interesting case because of the 3 cases you gave, its the most inhabited region. If there was no population-wide cancer spike post WW2, something that would be very easily measurable, I'd put it down to the heavy domestic consumption of seafood which is high in iodine. Which to some extent has probably primed their population to have higher resilience to long term genetic damage.
To what end? It gets to the heart of the current awakening, realizing that the folks running our government do not act as we assume they should, they did not act in good faith with our best interests in mind; instead, they are nasty and evil control freaks, using the citizenry as mere tools for their comfort.
If you change your perspective and theorize that they are not trying to benefit humanity but only themselves, it unfortunately makes perfect sense: they pretend it is dangerous in order to guarantee artificial scarcity, to monopolize an asset and to charge a hidden tax on the populace. Exactly like the planned obsolescence of light bulbs, DeBeers and their diamond cartel, or big pharma suppressing natural cures.
I won't pretend to have gone inside the power plants to be able to tell you exactly what is done inside. But I can tell you that Galen Winsor is logical and convincing, and he claims to have swum in the cooling pools of the power plants regularly. And the points in OP's graphic make sense. There are many common sense questions about nuclear energy and nuclear weapons to which the answers simply don't make sense.
A good common-sense case for it being a possible hoax, are written about here: https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/nuclear-q/
I made a smaller tease with similar questions here: https://media.greatawakening.win/post/AqzGbvGdalHb.png (ignore the Geiger counter question- that was gratuitous on my part ... but even that is worth questioning if you read the thread.)
Anyway, there's more to nuclear power than what gets reported in our science classes and newspapers. By all means, come to your own conclusions.
Sorry for the wall of text response. I guess a more direct answer is: what would you do if you had free energy? And more importantly, what would the cabal do? Would they give it away and make the world a better place? It depends on what their interests truly are.
Thanks for all of your responses, having the luxury of civil wall-of-text debates is something rare enough that I treasure the moments! So no need to apologize.
Anyways, what we agree on in common is that there is shared interest of people with the levers of power to keep holding and hoarding that power, no matter what. If that can be done with deception, it surely will be.
simples the oil and gas lobby!