Bear with me, this is a bit of a wordy explanation but I don't know how else to explain it.
Once upon a time, I got the idea I could beat the marginal odds enjoyed by casino's at the roulette table and decided to test my theory using online betting sites.
Standard distribution tends to follow a bell curve, and it's at both extremes of that bell curve that I felt it was possible to manipulate the odds slightly in my favour.
A typical roulette wheel has thirty seven numbers, 1-36 and a zero. I mention the zero separately becaue that is the house advantage. The reason for this is that all the other numbers can be bet on in various ways.
Odd/Even, 1-12/ 13-24/ 14-36, Black/Red and three 'rows'. None of these methods include the zero, so every time zero comes up the house wins everything (if people bet on zero they have reduced their odds of winning massively down to 1 in 37 so they don't do it).
Obviously it's possible to string together a short run of wins for the punter, but over time, for the casino, that 1 in 37 advantage is what makes it profitable.
Now, in order to overcome this I decided to use a martinet system as a base. Simply put, this is where you start your first bet with 1, and if you lose you double down until you win, then you go back to betting 1 again.
This theory is totally impossible to win with because roulette frequently throws up runs of reds, or blacks, or evens etc. so that the doubling affect quickly hits house limits on bets and you lose a huge amount of money.
However, it is possible to pre-load the odds and limit the doubling by bailing out of a run once it hits a certain amount. Also, betting on the 1 in 3 odds sectors can eke the raising cost to a few more spins before hitting the limit.
Now, I tried various different levels before hitting on one that worked in theory and tried it out for real with real money. I made money for two weeks and then it wouldn't work again, ever. So I adapted my theory and tried again.
Once more it lasted two weeks and then failed. This happened six times in a row, forcing me to conclude that they had a smart system running on their casino that analysed bets and worked out any pattern you might be using, then interjected a losing bet at the critical point to ensure you lost. Not enough to form it's own pattern in isolation, but I detected it due to the pattern of its operation.
So what I did then (at this point I was down £3000) was to combine all 6 variations at once. This was a nightmare to track six differnt betting patterns simultaneously without losing track, but I managed with a few mistakes here and there.
Over the course of the next month I not only made back my £3000 I made £800 profit. At which point I invested the £800 in a new laptop and exercise bike and quit due to nervous exhaustion.
I tell you all this because my mind is starting to recognise that there are many plans in motion, not one. Each plan exists in its own right and is not dependent on the others if one should fail, the others pick up the slack.
Overall there is an inexorable progress towards victory, but when most people try to analyse 'the plan' they are overwhelmed by what appears to be chaos and things that don't seem related. Again, this is because there are multiple plans in motion.
It would take an advanced AI to analyse the patterns and pull out all the various plans that are consistent within themselves. I can only tell that this is happening because of the above experience and the way my mind 'feels' numbers etc.
If you made it this far, thanks for reading, and well done! ( and welcome to a glimpse into my mind that I rarely share).
Aside from the multiple facet approach ( I believe this is the case also)
How you come to the concept is compelling and inspired a couple of thoughts.
First, the idea of Zero as the trickster. Bringing all to the zero sum balance. (see tarot).A Great Reset, so to speak.
I find it fun to muse how a coin toss is said to be 50/50 chance, but on retrospect was 100 percent, same toss. lol
Conscious NOUS enters the stage.
What you describe seems to my ears to be connected to an idea related to so-called 'String Theory'. With sets of potential futures.
However, that theory twists potential future realities into seeing them as actual simultaneously occurring ones. This neglects implications in Schroedinger's theoretical experiment as to these 'realities' being only potentials which then collapse upon the observer's observation or choice of action, with new sets of probable futures ....
This door opened and that 'hallway of doors' looked down..... futures...each door having its own set of probabilities that String Theorists misunderstand as 'realities' by confounding them with dimensions.
if that sounds confusing, it's only because it is. And always will be, when the part attempts to define the whole.
So is the NEXT coin toss still 50/50 after it has come up heads 5 times in a row? Why or why not?
Why was the 'law of probability' broken so badly in that run?
What can explain my sister-in-law praying for a miracle, going into a casino and with one pull win 90k on a slot?
So we project with math which is by nature retrospective.....as probability which attempts to control the uncontrollable mystery behind the order of numbers.
One can try to control the whole by creating a system out of the gamble, but when you least expect it, that trickster will find a way to zero the balance, and this is why the Joker/Trickster is so huge right now.
The Stars That Play With Laughing Sam's Dice are fickle. Don't bet the house or the house will win. Just don't tell that to my sister-in-law. kek
I think I grasp what you are saying, but it's more of a feeling for me than an analytical concept.
I once had a run of 17 black numbers in a row, each one with an almost 50/50 chance of happening, but combined the odds are quite remote.
bingo..our instincts are WHAT THEY CANT CONTROL..thus they have to throw multiple "choices" at us to throw us off...on top of that they bombard us with horse shit...once you see this you can't un see it