As I understand matters, on Friday (October 7), an injunction preventing Dennis Montgomery from speaking publicly was lifted. This brings Mr. Montgomery back to center stage. His story is unclear, and I thought I’d do what I could for the GAW community to describe his story as I understand it.
Mr. Montgomery is a software developer. He developed Hammer – which is one component of the infamous “Hammer and Scorecard” system, which you no doubt heard so much about.
Hammer is a generic tool for conducting man-in-the-middle (MITM) exploits. It can be pointed at any “secure” online communication session in order to eavesdrop on it. Mr. Montgomery licensed Hammer to the U.S. government, with a fee arrangement that obligated the government to pay him a royalty on a per-use basis.
The government has been using Hammer to eavesdrop on all sorts of communications: to spy on judges, politicians, political campaigns; to conduct insider trading; and so on. Evidently, this goes all the way up to Obama and Hillary.
The government also uses Hammer in connection with elections. If the government wants to alter an election, it uses Hammer together with Scorecard. Hammer intercepts the original data stream from election systems; Scorecard alters it; Hammer reintroduces the altered voting data into the data stream. So Hammer and Scorecard are designed to interoperate in order to alter elections. But Hammer can be used as a stand-alone tool to eavesdrop on secure communication, and that is how it is generally used.
Mr. Montgomery did not trust the government to actually pay him each time they used Hammer. So he designed the system to send all of the information it collected in the course of its use to his private servers – so he’d be able to prove that it was being used. That way he’d be able to enforce his royalty provisions. This means that when the government used Hammer and Scorecard to alter the 2020 election, all of the original voting data ended up on Mr. Montgomery’s private servers. This is the source of Mike Lindell’s PCAP data. It came from Mr. Montgomery’s private servers.
This is congruous with what Dr. Frank told me about the PCAP data more than a year ago. I attended an event that Dr. Frank (and others: Patrick Byrne, Jovan Pulitzer, General Flynn, etc.). was speaking at. At one point in the evening, I left the auditorium to hit the restroom and I saw Dr. Frank in the lobby, so I approached him. He was friendly as could be. Very open. Great man. He’s everything you hear about him and more. Anyhow, I asked him about the PCAPs. He told me that they are real. He further said that Mike Lindell was approached by insiders from three different agencies – including the NSA – and was given software to run. They told him the software would reach out through the Internet and retrieve the original election data. We now know that it reached out to Mr. Montgomery’s private servers to obtain the data.
One further thing. Dr. Frank told me that the real reason they couldn’t reveal the PCAP data was that the packets would reveal the method by which they were intercepted, and that would jeopardize national security. Well, they’d have the IP address of Mr. Montgomery’s private servers, and that would mean Hammer was used. So that’s correct.
Here’s a picture of me and Dr. Frank from the event, BTW: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnYrQlIP/
The hilarious part of all of this is that the entire thing is going to collapse on the evildoers because Mr. Montgomery didn’t trust the government not to cheat on royalty payments!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask away.
If I may I'd like to provide some context unlike our current crop of so-called journalists. First, I love Dr. Frank to death. If you've ever been privileged to be at an event where he brings his down syndrome daughter your heart will melt. I have followed him since the beginning of the covid hoax. As everyone was searching for answers to make things make sense he was among those in our state who stepped forward to analyze the numbers the governor was using to justify their stupid moves, and he clearly showed us it didn't add up. My personal assessment of Dr. Frank himself is that he is brilliant and deeply kind. But, like most people who have spent their lives studying one or two fields, there is some naivete or blind spots. You constantly hear him say that he is learning along the way, learning about how government actually operates and learning about people. He knows Covid is a hoax and is against the vaccine mandates yet in the talk he gave he spoke of prior work he'd done promoting the polio vaccine internationally and he is very proud of that. I don't think I was the only one in the room who cringed.
So, on the topic of Jovan. He said he cannot work with him. That is a huge statement from someone of Dr. Frank's temperament. He watched Jovan embed himself in the AZ investigation early on and says the Jovan gave up the only two pieces that would have provided the needed proof. Canvassing which has already been successfully started and I think the other thing had to do with looking inside the machines. Both of these were vital and Jovan tossed them both aside. We can all see that the AZ investigation got derailed and ended up going nowhere. He did mention Jovan is in it for profit.
General Flynn. Some of you won't like his phrasing but I happen to agree with this. He said as a Catholic General Flynn is a "baby Christian". That he found a prayer to read that he thought sounded good without any exploration of the meaning. He thinks Flynn is a patriot and a solid guy who has sacrificed a great deal.
Patrick Byrne. Dr. Frank says he is a good guy too even though he is "out there" with some of the things he says and does.
So take it for what it's worth. Dr. Frank has met and worked with these people. Dr. Frank is very much a "what you see you get" kind of person, honest and forthcoming. For me personally these comments confirmed how I feel about each of the four men from my own assessments.
A million thanks.