idk about some of these comments

gmo is sometimes really harmful to health: "Shock findings in new GMO study: Rats fed lifetime of GM corn grow horrifying tumors, 70% of females die early" https://www.naturalnews.com/037249_GMO_study_cancer_tumors_organ_damage.html

I guess in itself you could argue the tech is neutral, maybe. But you'd have to independently verify the gmo is not harmful. I don't have a lab or know anyone I trust who can do that. Ergo it would be considered uncertain at best. "organic" food has an anecdotal track record of however many centuries as being acceptable, while we wouldn't know the effects of GMOs possibly until it is too late.

seems like the GMOs are likely to be bred with a focus on being able to make more food, without any regard for how other things are affected. They will therefore likely compromise nutrition in pursuit of this goal. Even more nefarious would be food made that actively makes people sick, so that people could be fed cheap bad food while elites dine on "organic" food.

The other issue was they were trying to make "unowned organic" food in to "intellectual property" of patented GMOs so they could say who is allowed to own the seeds to grow foods. This is another important angle to keep in mind as to why GMO is sometimes pushed.

also organic can feed the world. it is more labor intensive tho. https://rodaleinstitute.org/blog/can-organic-feed-the-world/