Actually it is considered genetic modification still lol. They began cross-breeding in the late 1800's. Now it's far more advanced allowing them to extract specific genes obviously, but still really not that different logically.

Let me put it this way. Non-GMO crops require more pesticides, more chemicals to keep them healthy, and more resources overall. Actually many GMO plants don't even require pesticides at all.

So pick your poison? Would you rather have a genetically modified plant that is naturally resistant to the elements, or a plant sprayed by harsh chemicals?