the constitution isn't a living document, it's forever relevant.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
the way you mean it is the same as my interpretation, which is originalist. it's the same with people who want to preserve the Constitution and follow it.
when you see 'living document' in reference to the Constitution in the mainstream, those are people who basically want to make it say whatever they want at the time instead of actually following it.
a good contrast-
https://www.swindlelaw.com/2017/10/originalism-living-constitution-heritage/
the swamp's BS-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Constitution
If that's true why then did you make a false header? You compound the false nature of the header with the blurb about computers being relative to paper and pen and trying to compare THAT to muskets, as if any of that lying narrative is valid.
Why did you post it is dead if you don't think it is?
I know why you did, do you?
You don't know shit about me or much else obviously.
Watch your false mouf fella or fellette.
How about double up on your meds and you might comprehend what you're reading.