Alex Jones was at the top for spreading the truth about Sandy Hook. At the same time, it is believed Jones is controlled opposition. Was Jones's claims of Sandy Hook being a false flag and this trial planned years in advance to shut down conspiracy theorists in the future?
Perhaps the deepstate (Obama) fear the truth will be exposed in the future if Republicans gain control both houses. Obama knows they will investigate everything at a future date.
So they bring Jones in and perform a fake trial and hit him with a massive $950 million settlement which on outward appearance confirms the conspiracy theories to be lies.
The only problem is both trials were shams, and it was obvious Jones was getting railroaded.
Jones lost his first case by default.
The judge issued the default judgements against Jones and Infowars after Jones routinely failed to reply to requests to produce documents related to his conspiracy theories about the massacre.
https://www.campussafetymagazine.com/news/alex-jones-loses-2-sandy-hook-cases-by-default/
The second case the judge basically declared Jones guilty before the trial was finished. In both cases Jones never presented any evidence to back his claims that Sandy Hook was a false flag. WHY WOULD HE NOT DEFEND HIMSELF? There were a shit ton of evidence Jones could have presented.
Here is a PDF that explains some of the things Jones could have used to prove Sand Hook was a false flag and there is much more I can remember. Whoever wrote this thinks the Jones trials were fake also and presents his reasoning.
http://mileswmathis.com/jones3.pdf
On the other hand, I wonder if this Jones trial leads to the truth being presented in the appeals process. We needed to bring the Sandy Hook back to present day. The sham trials did that.
Perhaps Jones knew he would have a better chance of defending himself in the appeals court and decided to keep his evidence hidden till that time comes? Attempting to defend himself in this sham trial would just extend the trial and not change the outcome.
So, they hit Jones with a $950 million settlement, we have the sheep's attention, now lets appeal it and present all the evidence that confirms beyond a shadow of doubt that Sandy Hook was a false flag.
There is a current trend where conspiracy theories are becoming hard facts. Showing Sandy Hook was a false flag would be a wonderful way to expose how the evil media lies are being used to transform the country. The whole Sandy Hook event was created by the media from start to finish. Exposing the media for this would destroy them and also uncover the truth that our government was pushing these false flags to repeal the 2nd amendment. Pushing lies to strip us of our rights would be a giant wake up call for the sheeple.
If the country sees Sandy Hook for what it was (false flag), believing the child trafficking, pedophilia and election fraud claims would come much easier.
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
Had AJ just stated that all he claimed was based on opinion, it could have all been avoided. Why would Americans disallow dissenting opinions? Also, would a conviction based on dissenting opinion mean any dissenting opinion holders then be held financially responsible for " Emotional damage" in the future?