Mark Zuckerberg’s “META” Is a Flop – After Billions Spent – Less than 200,000 Users on its Virtual Reality Universe - There's a Surprise :) - The Great Awakening

Mark Zuckerberg’s “META” Is a Flop – After Billions Spent – Less than 200,000 Users on its Virtual Reality Universe - There's a Surprise :) (www.thegatewaypundit.com)

posted 2 years ago by larrythepatriot 2 years ago by larrythepatriot +91 / -0

Mark Zuckerberg's "META" Is a Flop - After Billions Spent - Less than 200,000 Users on its Virtual Reality Universe

Mark Zuckerberg’s “Meta” initiative is a flop. After billions spent, less than 200,000 users have signed up on its virtual reality universe. TGP reported on “Meta” when it first came out. It wasn’t clear if this was a huge mistake or a foreboding action...

48 comments

48 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (48)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– ThirstyLibertyTree 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Might need to calibrate your sarcasm meter and take a chill pill. Those places didn’t become violent, crime-ridden democrat crapholes because of video games.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Oh_Well_ian 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

There's literally no policing. Tell me when there was no policing. It's so easy for you people to understand that the MSM and pop culture is totally corrupt but give video games a pass. The gaming companies are run by the same people. It's psychological programming, especially for children. At very best, It's Entertainment. Low grade, lowbrow, low IQ entertainment.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q