Rise of the New Media Newsletter
Personal blog of political columnist and pundit Brian Cates. Formerly writing for The Epoch Times, X22 Report and Uncover DC. Click to read Rise of the New Media Newsletter, by Brian Cates, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of readers.
Durham Continues To Reveal Previously Undisclosed SpyGate Evidence How Do You Break 5 Years of Relentless & Endless Russia Russia Russia Propaganda Programming That Still Influences A Large Segment Of The American Public? John Durham Thinks He Knows...
Brian Cates Oct 16
Badlands Media will always put out its content for free, but you can support us by becoming a paid subscriber to this newsletter. Help our collective of citizen journalists take back the narrative from the MSM. We are the news now. Upgrade to paid
The trial of a key member of the Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign’s dirty tricks team is now winding down in an Alexandria, Virginia courtroom. A lot of media commentary regarding the Durham Special Counsel is being focused on a narrative that this trial will be it for Durham, and that he’s going to wrap it up now. There will be no further indictments or investigatory actions by the SCO and he’s going to devote his last months as Special Counsel to writing his final report.
“Yeah, keep telling yourselves that…” The narrative holds that Durham is going to completely ignore the second half of the scope he was given when he was appointed to be the Special Counsel to investigate the Spygate scandal. That is, that Durham will take no action on the multitude of obvious felonies that occurred when a bogus warrant application using fake shit that came straight from the Hillary Clinton campaign was approved and renewed three times to target the Donald J. Trump campaign for federal investigations and surveillance during the 2016 election and into the Trump administration itself. I disagree that Durham is going to shirk his duty and never address the main reason for his being appointed a Special Counsel before riding off into the sunset. Now I’ll explain why I think that. In ordinary cases, the prosecutor uses a grand jury, builds a case and then unseals indictments, makes arrests and then holds trials or accepts plea bargains on the basis of the evidence collected. It’s pretty straightforward. Except in the extraordinary circumstances where there’s been a massive criminal conspiracy amongst mainstream news media to taint your prospective jury pool for going on 5 + years. Most RICO investigations haven’t had:
And then have these same news media organizations keep up their immersive gaslighting for another three years while the US Attorney/Special Counsel is conducting his investigation. You either recognize this special situation that exists, or you do not. I can assure you from what I’ve observed of Durham since June of 2019, that he recognizes the task he faces in trying to counter almost 6 years of fanatical gaslighting about RussiaGate. Durham Is Engaged In Counter-Programming After Almost 6 Years of Gaslighting Durham is having to prosecute the massive RussiaGate ‘joint venture’ in reverse. He’s using the most minor of charges faced by ground-floor level RICO conspiracy personnel to surface key evidence that’s been held back for half a decade. He’s used the Sussmann & Danchenko trials as venues to bring out a ton of evidence. Why was much of this evidence held back for five years? I’m glad you asked. Durham’s had to do this backwards to counter a massive psychological disinformation campaign that is still ongoing, but now to much less effect than just a year or two ago. If all the things I’ve listed below came out five — or even just two — years ago, would it have moved the needle at all on the issue of RussiaGate? When most of the population is still buying into the ceaseless gaslighting? With the first two trials, Durham is putting the final nails in the coffin of that Russia Russia Russia disinformation campaign. I understand that a lot of people do not accept this take, that Durham’s been forced to do this backwards to try to counter more than 6 years of relentless propaganda and gaslighting so he can attempt fair trials. But it is an eminently rational position. Yes, I will stipulate for the record that if there had not been a vast, well-organized psychological operation targeting the American public for 6 years using
And a rather large segment of the American public are still influenced by that mass psychosis campaign. While many have woken up to the lies that were always the center of the “Russia Russia Russia!” hoax, some have not. People who keep insisting the big indictments needed to be unsealed years ago refuse to acknowledge the power of the psyop the American public has been subjected to. Durham realized early on the massive task they faced. He and his team had to counter more than three years worth of a mass formation psychosis before William Barr even appointed him. And the mass media campaign has continued ferociously as Durham has done his investigating for the past three years.
Yes, enough evidence had surfaced by June of 2019 for Durham to have begun unsealing indictments by early 2020, especially after DOJ Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz’s FISA Abuse Report was released in December of 2019. But Durham is a realist. He knew exactly what would happen if he went early and unsealed indictments against all the major players while Trump was still in the White House, while Barr was still Attorney General, and most of the American public was still slumbering peacefully in the arms of the Big Brother Fake News Media Matrix, being serenated with relentless, endless propaganda about how Trump was Putin’s stooge. How do you break the programming so you can get a fair hearing at the trials? How do you ‘redpill’ enough of the public to wake them up from the RussiaGate Matrix, so to speak?
The Great Awakening had to happen first. Not just on the national stage about the globalist and CCP threats, but also on the mainstream press, the DC cabal and the RussiaGate hoax that they invented and mesmerized much of the country with for more than five years. Durham has to attempt to level this playing field before he drops the big indictments. That’s the reasoning behind the strategy he’s been pursuing. What Evidence To Counter The Programming Did Durham Surface During The Sussmann Trial? What did Durham reveal during the Sussmann trial that had been carefully concealed for more than five years?
The face you make when you get caught as a private citizen with your own private spy ring spying on a sitting President in the White House Let’s count:
Great job Seer, thanks.
It is pretty obvious Durham is building a RICO case by the evidence he has brought to light in the Sussman and Danchenko trials.