This is an archived CDC document. Unless I missed something, all of the drug companies that produced these clot shots never stated that their poison prevented transmission. That was propaganda manufactured by the media, the CDC, public health officials, and other government entities to fear monger the public and work to shut us down. The drug companies never officially made those claims that I can recall. The data I read had as their research end goals only a reduction in symptoms. That's it. This whole nightmare was pushed because of a claim of about 95% relative risk reduction in severity of symptomology. Nothing in any of the trials that I read said anything about disease prevention. In fact, the studies were unblinded, data collection was stopped on those that were removed from the studies due to side effects, and the controls were lost when the jab was offered to the placebo groups. All indications of a completely failed product trial. The best they could come up with was some subjective reporting of reduction in symptoms and so called increases in antibody levels.
When they started the jab in every arm push I could not understand how the narrative was spun from a reduction in symptoms to prevention of disease. I was not the only one that saw this disconnect and others were also bringing up the point. But as time rolled on and so many other issues manifested in association with this assault on humanity, this fact seems to have fallen by the wayside. So, technically it was the government and the media that pushed the transmission angle. The drug companies allowed the government morons to run with their narrative and made a feeble attempt to have some level of deniability for their own self preservation that in the end will fail. They are still culpable. There was an agenda and it did not matter what the research actually stated. They are still pushing this vax agenda with little to no actual research. Who really is behind this?
This is far bigger than just the drug companies. They have only been one cog in the wheel of a much larger agenda that has been in the works for years and which has ties to the DoD, WEF, and others. The CDC and the FDA are only two of several three letter entities that need to go bye bye.
The CDC website clearly states farther down the page that the 95% effectiveness in infection prevention—which you’re only getting infected if the virus is transmitted to you by someone else—is based on clinical trials. That were hyperlinked to in the sentence stating the claim.
Where the main finding—and what they applied for EUA for—was less cases of COVID19 in the treated group over the controls.
Primary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose;170 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were evaluated, with 162 observed in the placebo group versus 8 in the vaccine group
I don’t disagree that the data and the studies claiming efficacy were absolute BS. I do disagree that transmission prevention was only pushed by the media.
I don't think "transmission" means what you think it does in this context. It does not refer to getting infected; I believe it refers to passing it along to someone else if you get infected. In other words, if I get the jab, does it make it so that I cannot transmit it to someone else, if I am asymptomatic. (This is a much more complicated and time-consuming test to perform. I suspect the "transmission" claim in the sense I am using it, was added without evidence by the media later)
Studies so far show that COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of the vaccinated person spreading COVID-19, by preventing infection in most but not all recipients, and if they test positive, they seem to be less likely to spread infection to their close contacts.
Do not allow yourself to get Mandala Effect-Ed by the PR spin that is occurring.
This is an archived CDC document. Unless I missed something, all of the drug companies that produced these clot shots never stated that their poison prevented transmission. That was propaganda manufactured by the media, the CDC, public health officials, and other government entities to fear monger the public and work to shut us down. The drug companies never officially made those claims that I can recall. The data I read had as their research end goals only a reduction in symptoms. That's it. This whole nightmare was pushed because of a claim of about 95% relative risk reduction in severity of symptomology. Nothing in any of the trials that I read said anything about disease prevention. In fact, the studies were unblinded, data collection was stopped on those that were removed from the studies due to side effects, and the controls were lost when the jab was offered to the placebo groups. All indications of a completely failed product trial. The best they could come up with was some subjective reporting of reduction in symptoms and so called increases in antibody levels.
When they started the jab in every arm push I could not understand how the narrative was spun from a reduction in symptoms to prevention of disease. I was not the only one that saw this disconnect and others were also bringing up the point. But as time rolled on and so many other issues manifested in association with this assault on humanity, this fact seems to have fallen by the wayside. So, technically it was the government and the media that pushed the transmission angle. The drug companies allowed the government morons to run with their narrative and made a feeble attempt to have some level of deniability for their own self preservation that in the end will fail. They are still culpable. There was an agenda and it did not matter what the research actually stated. They are still pushing this vax agenda with little to no actual research. Who really is behind this?
This is far bigger than just the drug companies. They have only been one cog in the wheel of a much larger agenda that has been in the works for years and which has ties to the DoD, WEF, and others. The CDC and the FDA are only two of several three letter entities that need to go bye bye.
The CDC website clearly states farther down the page that the 95% effectiveness in infection prevention—which you’re only getting infected if the virus is transmitted to you by someone else—is based on clinical trials. That were hyperlinked to in the sentence stating the claim.
But if you don’t believe me, you can take it from a Pfizer press release itself.
Where the main finding—and what they applied for EUA for—was less cases of COVID19 in the treated group over the controls.
I don’t disagree that the data and the studies claiming efficacy were absolute BS. I do disagree that transmission prevention was only pushed by the media.
I don't think "transmission" means what you think it does in this context. It does not refer to getting infected; I believe it refers to passing it along to someone else if you get infected. In other words, if I get the jab, does it make it so that I cannot transmit it to someone else, if I am asymptomatic. (This is a much more complicated and time-consuming test to perform. I suspect the "transmission" claim in the sense I am using it, was added without evidence by the media later)
That’s fair if you want to be pedantic.
But you need to consider that many places, like Alberta Health Canada, concluded the following all the way back in 2021.
Do not allow yourself to get Mandala Effect-Ed by the PR spin that is occurring.