If you answered “yes” to either of these questions, allow me to assist.
Durham’s role is much more significant than simply “prosecutor". His role is to brief the public on a broader conspiracy.
See my full analysis of the Danchenko verdict here!
https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/alter-your-perspective-on-durhams
How can he be found guilty of lying to the feebs if the feebs were paying him to say what he said????
You can't, yet Durham brought charges and went to trial anyway.
Yes and why would he do that?
So the truths are brought out publically for future prosecutions is the only reason that makes sense.