YO! Haters! So, GAW rolling with the Danchenko trial verdict is "moving the goalposts," is it? Like Danchenko was our big end goal or something? That's your big 'gotcha' for us? That's *retarded*. LOOK INTO MY EYES:
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
Normally, convictions are great for leverage in getting the convicted to talk. However, we aren't dealing with normal judges in Washington DC. The sentencing could be as little as probation and a fine. That's not very leverageable. It may well be, Durham knows this and is flanking the judge to set up other avenues. Who knows? I don't. It's a very slow game of chess. Durham is positioning, but hasn't so much as taken a pawn yet.