I've been working on the text for a proposed Constitutional amendment that enshrines our natural medical rights in order to prevent government from interfering with them ever again.
I'm asking for help in shaping the wording so that the text can be made perfect. (When the time comes that the amendment can be passed, the text should be ready in advance).
Here it is:
Government shall not pass any law infringing upon the sanctity and privacy of the relationship of doctor and patient, nor preventing patients from seeking medical care from experts of their own choosing, nor infringing upon the right of doctors to practice medicine according to their own research and conscience. No entity, public or private, shall mandate medical treatments of any kind, and government shall not enforce licensure onto professionals [which has historically been used to control and silence doctors], nor impose certificates of need [which are monopolistic]. Nor shall anyone infringe upon the right of visitation by family members, or whomever else the patient shall choose. Government shall not interfere in the free market of medical insurance or in prescription drugs, except for cases of fraud. The doctor and patient, not the government, shall be the arbiter of which drugs are used and for which purpose.
EDIT: (Based on comments). Ongoing.
I don't believe it's necessary, as I believe the constitution already guarantees our right in this area. However, if you want to improve it, I'd suggest you shorten your sentences. You've only got two sentences here and the first one is, imo, far too long. Get rid of all the 'nors' (no need to try to sound old timey) and create clearer, shorter sentences.
Thank you for your comments, I will try to fix the wording as best I can. Suggestions are welcome.
BTW I should point out that currently licenses ARE used to silence and control doctors, even against their own conscience, and certificates of need ARE currently used to suppress competition in medicine. Visitation HAS been infamously restricted during Covid, and over-regulation of medical insurance has been used to control medicine and drive up costs. If our Constitution prevents these things, it doesn't prevent them enough!
Also I've just realized I need to add something about the regulation of drugs (the FDA is horribly corrupt in this arena).
Thanks for being cool about the suggestion. As for the constitution, the protections are there, but the PEOPLE must learn about them and then hold authorities to their constitutional oaths. (All elected officials in the USA swear an oath to the constitution). Sadly, so many people, even many here at this board, either know very little about their rights or they are unwilling to fight for them. Time and again I saw people here saying they needed to know how to get a religious exemption from the shot, asap. But all the time they already had the constitution to fall back on, which I repeatedly told them. They didn't want to 'bother.' I didn't say it would be easy, or even free, but it is worth fighting for. Good luck!