Dennis Montgomery/Mike Lindell. Analysis plus minor update.
This is for all the marbles. All of them. For those of you who are unfamiliar with this matter, please see my write-up here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JnYrQlIR/dennis-montgomery-mike-lindell-a/
If you haven’t seen my explanation of legally what is going on, see here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6JSzFb9/dennis-montgomery-and-mike-linde/
Let’s begin with a minor legal update.
The judge has not issued a ruling on Mr. Lindell’s motion.
In federal court, a typical motion practice proceeds as follows: (1) a memorandum in support of a motion is filed with the court; (2) a memorandum opposing the motion is filed by “the other side”; (3) a reply to the opposition memorandum is filed by the moving party; (4) the court holds a hearing at which there is oral argument; and (5) the court rules on the matter.
Some steps don’t actually have to occur. A motion doesn’t have to be opposed – maybe both parties agree. Also, a reply brief doesn’t have to be filed, although I’ve not seen an instance where one isn’t filed. …When I wrote my previous legal explanation, my understanding was that Mr. Lindell’s attorney had indicated that the judge had issued a ruling lifting the protective order (i.e., the “gag order”). When I had checked the court’s docket on the morning I wrote the summary, I saw that the last item on the docket was the memorandum in opposition (filed by the United States). Given my understanding that a ruling had been made, I assumed that perhaps no reply brief was going to be filed, and that perhaps the judge had ruled from the bench at a hearing concerning the matter – and the ruling hadn’t yet been reduced to writing and entered in the docket.
Late that afternoon, I saw that the docket had been updated to include a court order allowing Mr. Lindell’s attorney an extension of time to file his reply memorandum. That means we are at step #3 in the process I outlined above. The deadline for the reply brief is tomorrow, October 21, 2022. So that is when it will be filed.
One more thing: the judge assigned to the matter is Miranda Du – an Obama appointee. I don’t know anything about her other than that.
OK… Now on to some speculative analysis.
Listen to these breathtaking recordings when you can. They are a little long. Pour yourself a bourbon and listen tonight.
These recordings appear to have been made covertly. I’m not certain on that point. They include Tim Blixseth (a billionaire who made his money in land/timber), Sherriff Joe Arpaio, and a third gentleman that appears to be a prosecuting attorney representing Maricopa County. From one of Montgomery’s declarations, I understand these recordings to have been made in 2013. The topic relates to Montgomery having approached Blixseth with data proving that Clapper and Brennan (among others) were abusing Hammer. There are other topics discussed too – Obama’s birth certificate, for example.
Here's a small portion of what I take from them:
-Hammer was developed by Montgomery, as I stated previously.
-Hammer uses “brute force” (among other methods?) to find the private asymmetric key of a target server. With that key, the subsequent exchange of the symmetric key used to secure the rest of the SSL (HTTPS) session is compromised. Thus the session can be listened in on.
-By virtue of eavesdropping on targeted HTTPS sessions, the CIA observed people entering their usernames and passwords to access various systems – that’s how the database with millions of Americans’ user names and passwords (to access their bank account information) was obtained.
-From 2004 to 2009, Hammer was run out of a server center in Reno, NV. In 2009, the CIA took it in-house to Fort Washington, MD at a “naval research center” that actually housed a custom-built supercomputer center to operationalize Hammer.
-You can hear that John Roberts was targeted, as was the head of the FISA court. This was in 2013 that the recording was made. So even back then, they wanted to abuse the FISA court to conduct illegal surveillance of political opponents, etc.
-My take on John Roberts. He was targeted because the Chief Justice has the sole, unfettered authority to place judges on the FISA court. That’s what Obama and crew wanted: they wanted corrupt judges on the FISA court, and needed Roberts to put them there.
I know this is a bit confusing because I’m sort of combining topics. I’m in a hurry today – my apologies.
I’ll conclude here, for now. This could use other ears and minds. Please assist with ears and bourbon tonight.
EDIT: THIS POST IS - FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF EFFORT AND STYLE AND CLARITY - NOT UP TO MY USUAL STANDARDS. MY APOLOGIES, THIS WAS A VERY BUSY DAY FOR ME AND I WANTED TO GET THIS INFO OUT.
I WILL FOLLOW UP AGAIN LATER WITH A POST THAT IS MORE ALONG THE LINES OF MY USUAL TONE, VOICE AND INFORMATIONAL DENSITY AND PACE.
simon,
Listened to the voice recordings...
From the discussions, it seems Dennis Montgomery had a very unique ability, for example when spying on Tim Blixseth attorneys during Blixseth divorce proceedings, and passed that on, real time, to Blixeth's wife (and her attorneys).
Blixseth suspected it at the time, apparently because while he may have had the best attorneys money could buy, nothing beats a full house like a royal straight flush, again and again and again.
Montgomery did the same thing during his court fight with Warren Trepp ( the 2007 Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies case ) by leaking compromising information to the press .
https://lasvegassun.com/news/2007/feb/22/claims-of-judicial-tampering-emerge-after-judges-r/
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/nv-man-is-zelig-of-gop-scandals
https://www.tahoedailytribune.com/news/gov-jim-gibbons-to-cooperate-in-fbi-probe/
Imaging how frustrated Blixseth's attorneys were when they were constantly being out maneuvered by the wife's attorneys.
Kind of begs the Question of what might happen if some white hats were able to weaponize this kind of complete telecommunications and internet surveillance on deep state and the puppet masters controlling them, don't you think?
And to be able to catch MSM network feeds, live, and insert interesting sound effects... https://youtu.be/F0YLJ4youbw?t=15
Ever seen anything resembling that kind of ability to always be one step ahead of the other guy, like you knew what they were about to know even before they did? And then use that information to counter whatever cockamamie scheme they were cooking up?
.
u/#q523
.
https://dennismontgomery.com/ scroll down to bottom of page / Operation Checkmate
https://operationcheckmate.net/
The chess notation for checkmate is #
Thoughts?
Every time you make a search on a drop by one-up serial number on https://qaggregator.news/ you start the search string with ## .
Look at the query string we have been given by qagg admin to embed Q drops into our comments...(space after u so no link embeds) u /#q523.
To make the same search on qagg.news you would put ##523.
If # + q = # + #, what is the value of q?
Think now of every time President Trump has dropped a 17 or a series of numbers that add up to 17 in a sentence, He is saying "checkmate, checkmate, checkmate...
Remember the famous press conference when he is asked about Q...
https://youtu.be/GNI553Np__k (timestamped)
"Well, I don't know much about the movement other than I understand they like me very much. Which I appreciate. But I don't know much about the movement. I have heard that it is gaining in popularity. And from what I hear this are people that when they watch the streets of Portland, when they watch what happened in New York City in just the last 6 or 7 months, but this was starting even 4 years ago when I came here. 4 years ago. Can you believe it. These are people who don't like what's going on in places like Portland and places like Chicago and New York and other cities and states. And I've heard these are people that love our country and just don't like seeing it. So I don't know really anything about it other than they do supposedly like me and they also would also like to see problems in these areas, like especially in these areas where we're talking about. Because there's no reason the Democrats can't run a city. And if they can't we will send in all of the Federal, whether its troops or law enforcement, whatever they'd like, we'll send them in we'll straighten out their problems in 24 hours or less. OK."
6 + 7 + 4 = 17 = Q = # = checkmate
And from what I hear this are people that when they watch the streets of Portland, when they watch what happened in New York City in just the last 6 or 7 months, but this was starting even 4 years ago when I came here."
And from what I hear this are people that when they watch the streets of Portland, when they watch what happened in New York City checkmate when I came here."
The streets of Portland, what happened in New York City... checkmate when I came here.
And this occasion:
16 June 2020 article from Popular Mechanics
"We have a - I call it the "super-duper missile." And I heard the other night, 17 times faster than what they have right now. You've heard Russia has five times, and China is working on five or six times. We have one 17 times. And it just got the go-ahead. Seventeen times faster, if you can believe that, General. That's something, right? Seventeen times faster than what we have right now. Fastest in the world by a factor of three."
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a32883396/super-duper-missile/
Here's the video of the press gaggle on 16 May 2020 the quote above is taken from:
https://youtu.be/PTZJFNCqvYI (1 min, 21 sec)
Not only is 17 repeated 4 times... but,
"Russia has five times, and China is working on five or six times. We have one..."
That's 5 + 5 + 6 + 1 = 17
That's 5 mentions of 17 in under 30 seconds.
Substitute "checkmate" for 17/Q and it sounds like President Tourette more than President Trump.
"We have a - I call it the "super-duper missile." And I heard the other night, checkmate times faster than what they have right now. You've heard Russia has checkmate, and China is working on checkmate or checkmate times. We have one checkmate times. And it just got the go-ahead. Checkmate times faster, if you can believe that, General. That's something, right? Checkmate times faster than what we have right now. Fastest in the world by a factor of three."
This is a stunning suggestion that I hadn't considered - in part because I've not really followed Q.
We now know that Montgomery designed Hammer to send all of the data intercepted in the course of its use to his personal servers. That's how Lindell has the original election data - he got it from Montgomery's private servers.
You are saying: what if insurgent "white hat" forces known as "Q" have been accessing that data to conduct their informational campaign?
Is that right? Is that what you're saying?
"We now know that Montgomery designed Hammer to send all of the data intercepted in the course of its use to his personal servers. That's how Lindell has the original election data - he got it from Montgomery's private servers."
At some point there has to be either a tap or splice or a hack or conventional access to communication hubs to source the collection and subsequent delivery of raw data from point A to Point B, and in the instance of the 2020 election we know there are a lot of Point A's and that Point B (as far as we have been told to date) is Dennis Montgomery.
Or is the correct description multiple and various Point A's (transfer points), multiple and various data transport solution Path B's, and Point C is Dennis Montgomery?
How did Dennis Montgomery access the communication processes of the election data for 50 states plus territories, collect and aggregate it?
Just the access problem is staggering. See post describing logistical and operational issues:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15K6SmwCqu/djt-on-truth-social-w-supercut-o/
Reading from transcripts and motions in the various court cases, a lot of data in those operations is delivered to Dennis Montgomery by courier at the Reno, NV operation site, the Bellevue WA operation site and the Fort Washington, MD operation site.
In the audio recordings you posted we hear of more active measures accessing data, but no description of how exactly the data was accessed, if Dennis did it all on his own, or if access was facilitated and he processed the data at his operational sites.
This question needs clarification to understand what is really going on (who is providing logistical and operational front end support in the actual access to the data) in the Hammer / Scorecard collection and analysis of the 32 terabytes of PCAP data of the manipulation (vote flipping) of the 2020 election.
Brute-forcing the private is, itself, a feat and would have been unthinkable.
How to use it once you've got it? You need to be situated to intercept (or at least post hoc acquire, if you merely want to listen in) the packets you wish to eavesdrop upon.
From Snowden, we know that all internet packets nationally were collected and stored. So, if mere eavesdropping was desired, the CIA* could use those, combined with the private key (and the symmetric key, unearthed by the private key).
To alter communication, you need to be in a position to intercept lines of communication live. That would require resources only the government would have, in order to do that in a comprehensive way. The CIA* used Montgemery's software, combined with their network access, to get this done.
Let me know if I'm not clear. I've had a few drinks tonight and am not proofing. Happy to try again tomorrow, sir.
Two things to set the stage...
We are talking about what actually happened in November 2020, not what theoretically might have happened. I'm proposing that until we know what we don't know we don't know what we don't know.
All we know now is that Dennis Montgomery collected data from all 50 states and territories and gave that data to Mike Lindell through intermediaries and now in order to use the data in his court case, Lindell has purchased an 80% interest in Dennis Montgomery Incorporated.
The question is how did Montgomery do what Mike Lindell says Montgomery did. No one is talking.
The CIA is not a logical organization to partner with Dennis Montgomery since he is suing (since June of 2017) the last last two former Directors of the CIA, one former Director of the NSA, two former Directors of National Intelligence and a former President of the United States for illegal warrantless mass surveillance of American citizens and government officials. So in general I have to push back pretty hard on the idea that the CIA is going to facilitate Dennis Montgomery having access to the raw data proving election manipulation of the 2020 election.
Before accepting on face value, that portion of the narrative story Mike Lindell is spinning, or purposefully publicly (for now) omitting, that Dennis Montgomery was the one-stop, all-in-one, end-to-end, source of the 32 terabytes of PCAP data, more information about the actual collection and data transport to the facility where it was processed and analyzed is needed.
Just the issue of bandwidth alone begs the question of who is Dennis Montgomery fronting for. Bandwidth is expen$ive, has to be engineered, connections made, tested and maintained. Money, time, and manpower. Dennis is old and has major health issues. Does not compute.
The second, and most important thing to consider is prior to the 2020 election (Jon Herold - patel patriot has a handle on this in his Devolution series), by Executive Order, signed by President Trump, the CIA was stripped of all authority to conduct covert actions and operations, domestic and foreign. DIA and Special Operations Command now share wearing that hat. Somebody got their tallywacker royally tallywacked.
"From Snowden, we know that all internet packets nationally were collected and stored."
Collected by the NSA and stored mainly at their long term storage Utah facility. CIA involvement on this scale would require NSA coordination and cooperation. One of NSA functions / authorities is administration and oversight of all government encrypted communications, systems and equipment, crypto-keys and equipment, and the equipment and bandwidth to interface it all. What was done in collecting the 32 terabytes of data of the 2020 election was a big operation involving cooperation and coordination on a national scale. The question remains, who or what did that.
Concur Snowden would have been cleared and exposed to technical and operational details of NSA collection and storage capabilities and operations while working for Booz-Allen as a contractor assigned to support NSA collection operations pre-2013. Not CIA collection operations and not in 2020. While not assigned to the Utah facility, he would have been cleared to know its function and interact as operationally required. Snowden's main job was facilitating access to information systems (blazing the trail, covertly of course) and extraction of information once identified by subject matter experts. Get in, get it, get out, and send it off. And don't get caught any time in the process.
CIA (as opposed to NSA) collection access operations are generally narrowly targeted operationally and in those instances were mass collection is the object NSA executes and CIA facilitates.
"So, if mere eavesdropping was desired, the CIA could use those, combined with the private key (and the symmetric key, unearthed by the private key)."
Its not about eavesdropping. Its about collecting at scale a massive amount of data in a short period of time. This was a heavy lift, short-lived 03 to 06 November 2020), collection operation. We are talking about getting the raw data collected, functions relating to the encryption exploitation comes later in the processing of the data.
"To alter communication, you need to be in a position to intercept lines of communication live. That would require resources only the government would have, in order to do that in a comprehensive way. The CIA used Montgomery's software, combined with their network access, to get this done."
The data was not altered at collection. The data was simply collected. Since the election data was data in transit, live vice stored data collection was required.
The CIA did not nor does not have either the authority nor capability to have accomplished what you propose, even before they got their tallywacked. We are talking about the coordinated interception and collection of live raw data (not processed live, post processed) of massive amounts of data over a short period of time over multiple access points and transporting that data back to one aggregation point (according to the Lindell narrative - Dennis Montgomery).
IMO Occam's razor cutting this knotty collection conundrum - is that data was collected (recorded) in batches at transfer points (this was an election data collection operation, not an election data manipulation operation), transported in some manner to Montgomery, where he administered it being played back into the Hammer/Scorecard system, in distinct batch runs, playing the election back, in Lindell's words, "like it was a movie," - like it was a lot of different movies from different parts of the country (what was playing in Peoria was not what was playing in Poughkeepsie), results analyzed and extrapolations of vote flips state by state, county by county, precinct by precinct, produced between the time Lindell received the data on 09 January 2021, claims he presented four "samples" to the president (though he seems to be referring to information on paper, not samples of the data stream and vote flipping) and the start of the Cyber Symposium on 10 August 2021 presented to the public... sort of.
Real time data collection and transport bandwidth for a three day period would have been insanely expensive (if even feasible), and an engineering marvel. Even if there was preexisting operational bandwidth to hijack, engineering pulling ongoing operations offline, conducting the 2020 elections data collection, and putting the original operations back on line is not something that could be done without a lot of people noticing who would started asking the wrong questions.
I guess I'm letting you know that you are not clear.