I ask again - what is your proposed solution beyond whining whenever something inconvenient for you is cited behind multiple unnamed sources? Do you propose a ban on unnamed sources? An official government board to vet and verify unnamed sources, thus hindering the ability for reporters to report things the government would rather you not know? An official industry board to vet and review things by media heads? A push for the public to fight against unnamed sources no matter how convenient or inconvenient that reporting is for their ideologies/preferred team? What?
And that hilarious caps locking above. Are y'all really pretending like if NBC NEWS had verified WaPo's reporting, that would mean a damn red cent to you? Like it wouldn't all be "Well of course EnbySemen would say that" or whatever amusing derogatory term is popular for that particular network right now? Sheesh.
I ask again - what is your proposed solution beyond whining whenever something inconvenient for you is cited behind multiple unnamed sources? Do you propose a ban on unnamed sources? An official government board to vet and verify unnamed sources, thus hindering the ability for reporters to report things the government would rather you not know? An official industry board to vet and review things by media heads? A push for the public to fight against unnamed sources no matter how convenient or inconvenient that reporting is for their ideologies/preferred team? What?
And that hilarious caps locking above. Are y'all really pretending like if NBC NEWS had verified WaPo's reporting, that would mean a damn red cent to you? Like it wouldn't all be "Well of course EnbySemen would say that" or whatever amusing derogatory term is popular for that particular network right now? Sheesh.