COVID Is Not A Virus, It’s A Parasitic Nano-weapon
(odysee.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
In all honesty, I really don't know your logic, but you attempted to shame a lot of people here, who follow Terrain theory. And you are now continuing it with your latest response. "....FE, sasquatch, aliens, reptilians". You said this. Not me or anyone else. This seems like another vain attempt to smear and discredit though. You are calling these things "bullshit", but I asked you in my previous post to make your position known on these questions?
Are you denying that there is evidence of snake venom in the spike protein? Are you also denying that studies show Atrazine causes demasculinization in male northern leopard frogs even at low concentrations? Why do you mock some prescient Christians by saying -- "It's a DNA altering mark of the beast that disconnects your soul from god!!!"
The subject at hand here is really Terrain Theory, which points out COVID is not a virus. Even the CDC has stated they have not ever isolated the virus. What is it then? So, how did they even make a purported vax☠xine for something not ever found?
In fact, no virus (measles, small pox, TB, polio, etc., etc.) has ever been isolated and purified. The lies are so ubiquitous, layered, and deep, it boggles the conscience. Terrain theory is more valid and true than Germ Theory ever was. Vax☠xines have never helped mankind. It's all a fraud. The American drug and vax☠xine industry actually got started by a traveling snake-oil salesman, who ripped off people with cancer. This is how Germ theory got started and became a monopoly in America, which has led to countless numbers of people being maimed and killed by injectoids and Allopathic drugs. All of the drugs sold happen to compromise the immune system. In addition, we wouldn't have ever experienced the impending medical tyranny we now face if Germ theory would return to its fraudulent-filled bottle.
Stew Peters has some reputable guests, but he isn't the only one talking about it. Many others are. Many people post these links here on GAW.
No. You are just probably overly sensitive and not confident in yiur beliefs. If you were thwn you wpuldnt have felt shamed.
You brought up the non sequitur "sensitive and not confident". These words were never used by me. This isn't germane or even relevant. Notwithstanding, you also know well that I never wrote about my state of feelings. Did you notice people down-voted you? Again, you seem to be injecting more nonsensical tripe distracting from investigating your own earlier statements. You won't declare your position on the questions I asked because the facts will reveal you erred.
Lol. Ok