The question was "what if there is no such thing as witness protection?" Knowing what we know about the FBI/CIA and how our government really works, what if the witnesses would have been the ones to sell out the 3 letter agencies responsible for a majority of the BS going on in this country, so they take out the loose ends but make themselves look like heros by saying they "relocated" them "for their own safety". Plus, none of them obviously care about our safety so why spend the time and funds to do so in the event of an actual crime? Anyone have anything on this???
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
The way it was worded made it sound like a bad thing. The stigma only stays because people would rather heel to their bias and ignore facts. We have the data now and we know better. If people choose to remain wilfully ignorant, so be it. It will be here regardless.
Glad to hear about your journey. I'll be the first to admit that it's certainly not for everyone and there are pros/cons just like anything else.