Classic. You libs always deviate from the topic. First you changed it to "beating" then you changed it to "slapping" when we were clearly speaking of spanking. Its a common tactic but I won't let you deviate. Again, spanking is the mode of punishment. Spanking.
Let's also separate physical punishment from a teaching method. One does not turn to spanking unless the situation calls for it and, in most cases, a teaching moment had already been implemented. No one claimed physical punishment was the first nor the only method of punishment. The topic and thread was about physical punishment hence the talk about said method that included spanking.
It's always you closed minded and mentally absolute smooth brained chumps who weave a larger topic into a narrow discussion then pretend the smaller subsect speaks for the entirety of your ill introduced subject. I won't pretend you understood that at the onset of you weak argument but thought I would clear that up.
You smooth brains also, to your detriment, see the world in black and white but only when its convenient. Why? Because it suits your capability. Your type do not have the ability to think in terms of depth of thought. Depth of knowledge does not exist in your world. Your taught what to think not how to think. Hence you always revert back to the "true and tried" absolutist comments and thoughts. You carelessly hurl unproven percentages that at their face are absurd like "100%". These ddon't exist in the real world and stand untested. Then when faced with being called on those accusations your type inevitably site some opinion article without a shred of verifiable data (which you will fight the urge to do now no doubt).
I'll admit to one error. My error was assuming that I didn't have to clear this crap up to your type.
But now that we're here. Human psychology is probably one of the most studied subjects in existence. It has been picked apart back to the dawn of man. Humans simply learn most efficiently and directly with immediate and sometimes painful feedback. From not eating berrys and plants that make one violently ill, not fucking with lions because they cause pain to not sticking your hand in fire. It is the very reason why humans have pain receptors. It is to alert the human that somethig is wrong and to proceed with caution. At the very moment of pain the human brain immediately focuses all senses to what caused said pain. In that moment, faster than 25 nano seconds, it records the equivalent of terabytes of data. The feeling, the smell in the air, the image and every color within that color spectrum, the human reaction to pain, all of it. All of those resources laser focused for that split second of time methodically, efficiently and with great precision taught a lesson.
It is the very process of thousands of years of human refinement and perfection that your smooth brain argument arrogantly professes to know better of with a simple black and white word salad. It's a down right joke. Not your lack of knowledge but your inability to learn and honestly what appears to infect your type, your wanting and arrogant resistance to learn. Not because you have something to learn but instead because you feel you've reached your pinnacle.
In closing. Your experience around bad parents who may have beat or "slapped" kids has no bearing on good parents ability to discipline their kids in a manner that's conducive to direct feedback to their child when he or she deviates into a situation that would cause them greater harm than a spanking on their bottom.
You can tackle your grievances and demons where they lay at the feet of bad parents who beat their children but don't pretend to know better and proceed to spout your confused venom where it doesn't belong or is deserved. Until then come at me with data that proves me wrong rather than spewing your junk at parents like me because you don't have the balls to face your demons or the bad parents to their face.
P.s.
Not that I need to explain myself to you but I am a single father to a 14 year old who never felt the rath of angry father. Not once. Yet has deserved it more than once. Your ignorance of the precarious balancing act a parent undergoes when raising a child from birth is astonishing.
Classic. You libs always deviate from the topic. First you changed it to "beating" then you changed it to "slapping" when we were clearly speaking of spanking. Its a common tactic but I won't let you deviate. Again, spanking is the mode of punishment. Spanking.
Let's also separate physical punishment from a teaching method. One does not turn to spanking unless the situation calls for it and, in most cases, a teaching moment had already been implemented. No one claimed physical punishment was the first nor the only method of punishment. The topic and thread was about physical punishment hence the talk about said method that included spanking.
It's always you closed minded and mentally absolute smooth brained chumps who weave a larger topic into a narrow discussion then pretend the smaller subsect speaks for the entirety of your ill introduced subject. I won't pretend you understood that at the onset of you weak argument but thought I would clear that up.
You smooth brains also, to your detriment, see the world in black and white but only when its convenient. Why? Because it suits your capability. Your type do not have the ability to think in terms of depth of thought. Depth of knowledge does not exist in your world. Your taught what to think not how to think. Hence you always revert back to the "true and tried" absolutist comments and thoughts. You carelessly hurl unproven percentages that at their face are absurd like "100%". These ddon't exist in the real world and stand untested. Then when faced with being called on those accusations your type inevitably site some opinion article without a shred of verifiable data (which you will fight the urge to do now no doubt).
I'll admit to one error. My error was assuming that I didn't have to clear this crap up to your type.
But now that we're here. Human psychology is probably one of the most studied subjects in existence. It has been picked apart back to the dawn of man. Humans simply learn most efficiently and directly with immediate and sometimes painful feedback. From not eating berrys and plants that make one violently ill, not fucking with lions because they cause pain to not sticking your hand in fire. It is the very reason why humans have pain receptors. It is to alert the human that somethig is wrong and to proceed with caution. At the very moment of pain the human brain immediately focuses all senses to what caused said pain. In that moment, faster than 25 nano seconds, it records the equivalent of terabytes of data. The feeling, the smell in the air, the image and every color within that color spectrum, the human reaction to pain, all of it. All of those resources laser focused for that split second of time methodically, efficiently and with great precision taught a lesson.
It is the very process of thousands of years of human refinement and perfection that your smooth brain argument arrogantly professes to know better of with a simple black and white word salad. It's a down right joke. Not your lack of knowledge but your inability to learn and honestly what appears to infect your type, your wanting and arrogant resistance to learn. Not because you have something to learn but instead because you feel you've reached your pinnacle.
In closing. Your experience around bad parents who may have beat or "slapped" kids has no bearing on good parents ability to discipline their kids in a manner that's conducive to direct feedback to their child when he or she deviates into a situation that would cause them greater harm than a spanking on their bottom.
You can tackle your grievances and demons where they lay at the feet of bad parents who beat their children but don't pretend to know better and proceed to spout your confused venom where it doesn't belong or is deserved. Until then come at me with data that proves me wrong rather than spewing your junk at parents like me because you don't have the balls to face your demons or the bad parents to their face.
P.s. Not that I need to explain myself to you but I am a single father to a 14 year old who never felt the rath of angry father. Not once. Yet has deserved it more than once. Your ignorance of the precarious balancing act a parent undergoes when raising a child from birth is astonishing.