So Elon walked into Twitter, with a sink. He posted on Twitter Let that sink in. The exact same words as post 621. The date was important because that’s what pointed to 621 10/26 think mirror drop the 0 and it was found.
Can someone link me or point me towards understanding something? What’s to stop Elon or any high popularity figure from paying some smartass to look over Q posts and make their own proofs? What I mean is how do we know Elon didn’t do some study or pay someone to study some Q posts and he saw this one, and they decided they’d walk into a building holding a sink and say let that sink in? Obviously the number of opportunities would be narrowing as every day goes by but I’d like To understand how it is that we know this to be intentional while not intentionally misleading. If I haven’t phrased this clearly let me know and I’ll try to explain better what I mean.
Perfectly legitimate question and obviously there's nothing stopping people from lining up their activities with Q post dates.
It's up to us individually to weight that possibility and decide if it's more likely a hoax or a link to Q activity.