Indulgences were supposed to be an offering of personal sacrifice to help people in purgatory. You don’t know what you’re talking about. Original sin is not a false teaching - Adam and Eve sinned and because of this no human was perfect except Mary, who needed to be granted grace to make her pure enough to be the Ark of the New Covenant, able to carry the Son of God having not been touched by man.
What a silly misconstrual if the passage in Ezekiel...this doesn’t mean that children are born without sin. It means that children will not be held accountable under the law (either man’s or God’s) for sins they do not commit.
Jesus Christ died so that a child can be saved - the child is not culpable as an adult is culpable, yet still is a sinner (for all have sinned and fallen short of the glory if God).
The apostles believed in purgatory. Were they mistaken? Jesus taught them. What did they miss in walking with our Lord?
Do not deny the Holy Spirit. You are not having this conversation because you think you are somehow witnessing to me. You are having this conversation because you feel the Truth stirring deep in your conscience and it makes you feel uncomfortable.
“My theology flows from the word of God itself and nothing else. I don't need to read "church fathers" I have concordances among concordances Vines, Strongs, Greek and Hebrew bibles, commentaries from 1700+ Matthew Henry, Adam Clarke, Jim Sheerer, Ellicott's, blah...blah...blah. I can also read word for word the preserved and inspired word of God as I have done all my years and see the truth.”
I have read concordances which contain analysis - so that is what I was referring to. Commentaries from 1700+ are anachronistic heresy if they are protestant since their first principle is to protest the Church which literally put the bible together as one book and wrote the entire new testament.
The commentaries are the problem. They are heretical.
Read commentary from the early church to correct your error. Even Calvin recognizes the importance of church fathers.
Why do you think you know better than Ignatius who was ordained by John?
You reject the pope but anoint yourself. Incredible!
Indulgences don’t buy someone out of hell
Indulgences were supposed to be an offering of personal sacrifice to help people in purgatory. You don’t know what you’re talking about. Original sin is not a false teaching - Adam and Eve sinned and because of this no human was perfect except Mary, who needed to be granted grace to make her pure enough to be the Ark of the New Covenant, able to carry the Son of God having not been touched by man.
What a silly misconstrual if the passage in Ezekiel...this doesn’t mean that children are born without sin. It means that children will not be held accountable under the law (either man’s or God’s) for sins they do not commit.
Jesus Christ died so that a child can be saved - the child is not culpable as an adult is culpable, yet still is a sinner (for all have sinned and fallen short of the glory if God).
She was the only human born as pure as Eve.
The apostles believed in purgatory. Were they mistaken? Jesus taught them. What did they miss in walking with our Lord?
Do not deny the Holy Spirit. You are not having this conversation because you think you are somehow witnessing to me. You are having this conversation because you feel the Truth stirring deep in your conscience and it makes you feel uncomfortable.
Stop teaching. You are in error.
Does Strong’s concordance not include interpretive notes/study notes?
“My theology flows from the word of God itself and nothing else. I don't need to read "church fathers" I have concordances among concordances Vines, Strongs, Greek and Hebrew bibles, commentaries from 1700+ Matthew Henry, Adam Clarke, Jim Sheerer, Ellicott's, blah...blah...blah. I can also read word for word the preserved and inspired word of God as I have done all my years and see the truth.”
I have read concordances which contain analysis - so that is what I was referring to. Commentaries from 1700+ are anachronistic heresy if they are protestant since their first principle is to protest the Church which literally put the bible together as one book and wrote the entire new testament.
The commentaries are the problem. They are heretical.
Read commentary from the early church to correct your error. Even Calvin recognizes the importance of church fathers.
Why do you think you know better than Ignatius who was ordained by John?
You reject the pope but anoint yourself. Incredible!