Right? This makes me feel like the mods are compromised. Your second hand knowledge is clearly much more true than the second hand knowledge 1MarkSeeker was mentioning. Neither of you know, and you never will. You're not privy to the experience of that situation first hand, and that makes the information suspect to any free thinking person following the scientific method. Anything else is blind faith, and in this case that blind faith is placed in well known masons. This place is becoming Reddit.
Exactly! We have never held any anon accountable for spewing out retarded q maps that once time had passed to verify their predictions, were absolutely wrong. If you believe the earth is round good for you if you believe it’s flat good for you. If you can’t talk about ideas that’s bad for everyone. Just because a mod gets triggered, and flexes mod privileges, that is wrong and bad for truth. Let truth come out naturally. Not through a mods eyes. Anons have been free to be wrong or right for a majority of the time I’ve been on here. If that changes then this site will die. We are all smart enough to see an overreach by this point in the game.
The comment is not Q material. And anyone who seriously thinks that it is "iMpOsSiBle" to fly past the Van Allen Radiation belts is either a commie loon, or a retard, and simply needs to GTFO of whatever space they are occupying.
Not so agreed that there really has been space travel, if we are acknowledging the radiation levels of the belt then there needs to be some form of shielding.
I would be willing to accept some tech that's beyond what is publicly known, but things aren't that cut and dried.
Dangerous space radiation is short wavelength, which is quite easy to shield against. For example, thin aluminum plates alone can stop a significant portion of it. Radiation shielding for space flight is really more about the costs associated with adding weight, and bulk to space craft, rather than any technological limitations.
The Van Allen Belts were discovered by Explorer I, which was NOT shielded because no one knew of the belts beforehand. But the belts did not destroy Explorer I. Even the fuselage of the Apollo capsule counts as shielding---provided you zip through the belts at a speed of ~10 km/second. Multiple visits to the Moon. No particular problem with the belts. The Big Insight is that you don't just stop and loiter in them, like it's some kind of sauna. That would be idiotic. (Do we all take dental X-rays? Yes? Nobody is dead? Same thing.)
I'm a bit torn on this; for the sake of not turning off the newly red-pilled and because it's a topic that can so easily be used as a smear, I would reluctantly agree that the Q forum is not the appropriate place for the topic.
OTOH; there is much more legitimacy to the topic when you come to terms with how much of what is known is dependent on NASA (and a bit less on Chinese or Russian space agencies); that the science is constantly being adjusted to make the observations fit the theory (for example; general relativity has been long debunked by the observable universe, but rather than saying Einstein got it wrong, they add dark matter to the equation but even that doesn't cut it so then they need dark energy).
If you had asked me even 2 months ago, I would have argued that it's self-evident and the proponents are clearly shills... I don't believe the answer to be so simple anymore.
Does it need to be deleted? We should expect the average anon has enough discernment to decide whether it's something worth looking into or not.
Again:
JWST
is 1,000,000 miles
past the moon
at LaGrange point L2
Did you know that NASA is the #1 consumer of helium?
Dude, are you serious? I was reporting 10 misinfo posts a day and they were all left up.
Why are you so worried about this ONE tiny thing that doesn't even affect life on this planet?
That shouldn't be. Legit. Keep deporting.
fuck yea delete that shit
Right? This makes me feel like the mods are compromised. Your second hand knowledge is clearly much more true than the second hand knowledge 1MarkSeeker was mentioning. Neither of you know, and you never will. You're not privy to the experience of that situation first hand, and that makes the information suspect to any free thinking person following the scientific method. Anything else is blind faith, and in this case that blind faith is placed in well known masons. This place is becoming Reddit.
Exactly! We have never held any anon accountable for spewing out retarded q maps that once time had passed to verify their predictions, were absolutely wrong. If you believe the earth is round good for you if you believe it’s flat good for you. If you can’t talk about ideas that’s bad for everyone. Just because a mod gets triggered, and flexes mod privileges, that is wrong and bad for truth. Let truth come out naturally. Not through a mods eyes. Anons have been free to be wrong or right for a majority of the time I’ve been on here. If that changes then this site will die. We are all smart enough to see an overreach by this point in the game.
THIS USER HAS NO POSTS
Who are you to criticize other posters when you have no posts, yourself?!?
That's because this is a heavily curated Q-focused WIN. If you don't prefer this, there are other .WINs out there which may better suit your style.
The comment is not Q material. And anyone who seriously thinks that it is "iMpOsSiBle" to fly past the Van Allen Radiation belts is either a commie loon, or a retard, and simply needs to GTFO of whatever space they are occupying.
Agreed, not Q material.
Not so agreed that there really has been space travel, if we are acknowledging the radiation levels of the belt then there needs to be some form of shielding.
I would be willing to accept some tech that's beyond what is publicly known, but things aren't that cut and dried.
Dangerous space radiation is short wavelength, which is quite easy to shield against. For example, thin aluminum plates alone can stop a significant portion of it. Radiation shielding for space flight is really more about the costs associated with adding weight, and bulk to space craft, rather than any technological limitations.
The Van Allen Belts were discovered by Explorer I, which was NOT shielded because no one knew of the belts beforehand. But the belts did not destroy Explorer I. Even the fuselage of the Apollo capsule counts as shielding---provided you zip through the belts at a speed of ~10 km/second. Multiple visits to the Moon. No particular problem with the belts. The Big Insight is that you don't just stop and loiter in them, like it's some kind of sauna. That would be idiotic. (Do we all take dental X-rays? Yes? Nobody is dead? Same thing.)
I'm a bit torn on this; for the sake of not turning off the newly red-pilled and because it's a topic that can so easily be used as a smear, I would reluctantly agree that the Q forum is not the appropriate place for the topic.
OTOH; there is much more legitimacy to the topic when you come to terms with how much of what is known is dependent on NASA (and a bit less on Chinese or Russian space agencies); that the science is constantly being adjusted to make the observations fit the theory (for example; general relativity has been long debunked by the observable universe, but rather than saying Einstein got it wrong, they add dark matter to the equation but even that doesn't cut it so then they need dark energy).
If you had asked me even 2 months ago, I would have argued that it's self-evident and the proponents are clearly shills... I don't believe the answer to be so simple anymore.