Isn’t that interesting that the % of the invalid votes was constantly the same, as if the statistical sample we had at the beginning was representative enough.
But the results have changed from 56.7% to below 50%.
”A representative sample is a group or set chosen from a larger statistical population or group of factors or instances that adequately replicates the larger group according to whatever characteristic or quality is under study.”
How come that statistical sample was big enough to perfectly estimate the smaller group (the % of invalid votes) but it didn’t represent the bigger part (statistically easier to estimate).
This smells really bad - current values from the link:
Jair Bolsonaro - 51.6% - 12,108,636
Lula - 48.4% - 11,373,292
Invalid/null - 1,008,297
Why so many invalid votes?
Why the difference is changing that much comparing to the screenshot?
It still says Live so they’re going to change it.
They’re going to screw it …
Standard Biden-like curve.
Isn’t that interesting that the % of the invalid votes was constantly the same, as if the statistical sample we had at the beginning was representative enough.
But the results have changed from 56.7% to below 50%.
How come that statistical sample was big enough to perfectly estimate the smaller group (the % of invalid votes) but it didn’t represent the bigger part (statistically easier to estimate).
Just wondering: Do they use The Hammer software in Brasil?
Is that why the wanted to flood Google search results with “Pelosi hammer” content?
See: Pelosi’s son and Hammer software.