I believe Anons fundamentally misunderstand the value of Juan and Nino's conversations.
It isn't about verifying information, or proving something 'correct' or 'incorrect', its about GAME THEORY, and learning how to analyze the moves and counter moves available to the Deep State and the Cabal on the great board of chess we are witnessing play out throughout the world.
There is no right or wrong in a game of chess, there are only possibilities for the next move. The only ultimatum in a game of chess is when a check mate has occurred. Before the checkmate, it is a delicate dance of moves and counter moves. The Cabal may take a Rook, the Q team may take a Bishop, on and on the game will go; piece after piece being removed until only a few are left.
Juan presents possible moves on the chess board. Nothing more, nothing less. Just because a move is available to a master chess player, doesn't mean that move will be taken immediately, or even at all. Sometimes an available move is not taken in favor of a more favorable move. Sometimes the Game Theory demands that a player deliberately not act on a favorable move in order to gain an advantage at a later point in the game.
Anons have this notion that people like Juan should be held up to Godlike standards, and that their predictions must come true, or else they are larpers, or con artists. Anons need to shoulder the burden of analysis in these matters. In the same breath Anons ridicule Juan for not giving them clear answers, and then lambast him when the moves and counter moves he theorized about haven't come to pass.
For a more in depth discussion on Game Theory, see my post titled:
Ok, let's talk about game theory. What advantage is gained by telling the Q community "I'm the only one who is sharing this information, Trump may or may not be arrested soon."
Thus far, we've been told we're watching a movie and that patriots are in control. We've been told by Q that Trump is safe. Anons have also speculated that Trump is also currently (secretly) still the president.
The idea that Trump can be arrested negates all three above points. Patriots would not be in control, Trump is not safe, and a sitting president cannot be arrested so he must not be the president.
Unless the plan is to have Trump arrested. But, if that's the case, even then Juan is still incorrect, because he's presenting the cabal as being in power enough to arrest Trump, but in reality it would be Trump allowing himself to be arrested as part of the plan.
I contend that if Trump is arrested
the foreknowledge of the arrest has no value
that Juan isn't shown to be having any particular insight, because he stated it might or might not happen covering every possible outcome
that the reasoning behind the arrest would be different than Juan suggests, as Juan suggests its because the cabal is wielding power, whereas the real reason is that it's a feature of the plan to move people closer to the precipice
I have a post I am working on that will explore the possibility of a President Trump arrest. I believe it is entirely possible for President Trump to be arrested, while also being protected by Patriots. The two are not mutually exclusive.
the foreknowledge of the arrest has no value
I would tend to disagree on this one. I think the foreknowledge of an arrest of President Trump gives Anons the time needed to sow peace and calm within the community, and anticipate the happening, so as to avoid civil unrest and the sparks of civil war. More on this in my upcoming post though!
Juan is still incorrect, because he's presenting the cabal as being in power enough to arrest Trump
Okay... I typically do not like Jesus metaphors, but hear me out on this one... (by the way, I'm not comparing Trump to Jesus, only the contextual situation they both found themselves in...)
Jesus knew ahead of time that he would be arrested, and yet he still let it happen. He told his followers that this would happen, and that they must let it happen. The Romans were not more powerful than Jesus. Jesus allowed the Romans to arrest him in order to gain an advantage for humanity.
It is very possible that the White Hats themselves will be the ones who arrest President Trump, and pin the happening on the Democrats. He can be insulated with Patriots while the narrative unfolds that it was the Democrats who arrested him. The narrative must be built that the arrest of a former President is not only possible, but has already occurred, thus giving precedence when Biden, Obama, and Bush are all arrested for their treason.
Legally, there is no need for a precedence, but narratively there needs to be a set up.
I could go on and on about this topic, but I'll save the rest of this discussion for a more comprehensive post on the matter. Look for this post in the coming days before election. I would really like to continue this discussion!
I believe Anons fundamentally misunderstand the value of Juan and Nino's conversations.
It isn't about verifying information, or proving something 'correct' or 'incorrect', its about GAME THEORY, and learning how to analyze the moves and counter moves available to the Deep State and the Cabal on the great board of chess we are witnessing play out throughout the world.
There is no right or wrong in a game of chess, there are only possibilities for the next move. The only ultimatum in a game of chess is when a check mate has occurred. Before the checkmate, it is a delicate dance of moves and counter moves. The Cabal may take a Rook, the Q team may take a Bishop, on and on the game will go; piece after piece being removed until only a few are left.
Juan presents possible moves on the chess board. Nothing more, nothing less. Just because a move is available to a master chess player, doesn't mean that move will be taken immediately, or even at all. Sometimes an available move is not taken in favor of a more favorable move. Sometimes the Game Theory demands that a player deliberately not act on a favorable move in order to gain an advantage at a later point in the game.
Anons have this notion that people like Juan should be held up to Godlike standards, and that their predictions must come true, or else they are larpers, or con artists. Anons need to shoulder the burden of analysis in these matters. In the same breath Anons ridicule Juan for not giving them clear answers, and then lambast him when the moves and counter moves he theorized about haven't come to pass.
For a more in depth discussion on Game Theory, see my post titled:
“Do emotions affect critical thinking?,” — “Do not let personal desires take over,” — “Emotions cloud judgement,” — “Emotions cloud logic,” “Events > Dates,” — “Logical thinking and strategy should always be applied,” "Game theory," — “Moves and countermoves,” — “Future proves past.”
Ok, let's talk about game theory. What advantage is gained by telling the Q community "I'm the only one who is sharing this information, Trump may or may not be arrested soon."
Thus far, we've been told we're watching a movie and that patriots are in control. We've been told by Q that Trump is safe. Anons have also speculated that Trump is also currently (secretly) still the president.
The idea that Trump can be arrested negates all three above points. Patriots would not be in control, Trump is not safe, and a sitting president cannot be arrested so he must not be the president.
Unless the plan is to have Trump arrested. But, if that's the case, even then Juan is still incorrect, because he's presenting the cabal as being in power enough to arrest Trump, but in reality it would be Trump allowing himself to be arrested as part of the plan.
I contend that if Trump is arrested
Otherwise, Juan is negating Q.
u/#q661
I have a post I am working on that will explore the possibility of a President Trump arrest. I believe it is entirely possible for President Trump to be arrested, while also being protected by Patriots. The two are not mutually exclusive.
I would tend to disagree on this one. I think the foreknowledge of an arrest of President Trump gives Anons the time needed to sow peace and calm within the community, and anticipate the happening, so as to avoid civil unrest and the sparks of civil war. More on this in my upcoming post though!
Okay... I typically do not like Jesus metaphors, but hear me out on this one... (by the way, I'm not comparing Trump to Jesus, only the contextual situation they both found themselves in...)
Jesus knew ahead of time that he would be arrested, and yet he still let it happen. He told his followers that this would happen, and that they must let it happen. The Romans were not more powerful than Jesus. Jesus allowed the Romans to arrest him in order to gain an advantage for humanity.
It is very possible that the White Hats themselves will be the ones who arrest President Trump, and pin the happening on the Democrats. He can be insulated with Patriots while the narrative unfolds that it was the Democrats who arrested him. The narrative must be built that the arrest of a former President is not only possible, but has already occurred, thus giving precedence when Biden, Obama, and Bush are all arrested for their treason.
Legally, there is no need for a precedence, but narratively there needs to be a set up.
I could go on and on about this topic, but I'll save the rest of this discussion for a more comprehensive post on the matter. Look for this post in the coming days before election. I would really like to continue this discussion!
THIS! 👆