From my election data analysis from US the last 6 years or so, it appears that in a 2-person race any numbers above about 2/3 (66%) in favor of one candidate indicates cheating of some kind. Once you hit 70%, the probability of cheating goes up dramatically, and over 75% it rapidly approaches 100% probability. This appears to be why in the US, the Democratic leadership in the House all typically have wins greater than 75% because they PAY for those numbers and get treated like "royalty" by those rigging the system by giving them 75-25, 80-20, and 85-15 "victories".
They have to be more careful in Senate races and they typically follow the Hammer & Scorecard preprogrammed differentials which are in around 2.2% increments from what I recall. This means that a Senate victory may be typically be 51.1-48.9 (2.2 delta) or 52.2-47.8 (4.4 delta). This is how H&S works: it goalseeks the desired "margin of victory" by switching enough votes to hit the target. If you want to win you PAY, if you want to win bigger you PAY more. [if you get the raw 2020 CA election day computer results before the ballot harvesting you can see all of the increments. EVERY race had precise margins of victory because every race used Hammer & Scorecard. There appeared to be at least 6 tiers of victory margin].
I believe the caution in the Senate races is there because the prospect of a Democrat getting elected to ANY Senate seat in a Red State is nearly mathematically impossible. And if too many people start running the numbers based on actual Senate voter locations anything bigger than a small victory falls apart quite quickly. Theoretically, if a State is majority Red, no Democratic Senators should ever be elected.
I deleted my original analysis of CA 2020 data after sending some of the results to the Trump campaign, but I thought I would share what I recall so other anons could be on the lookout for some "victory margin" signatures of the Hammer & Scorecard system in the upcoming mid-terms.
I am the farthest thing you can get from a numbers person so these are just my informal observations. 2018 was the first time I bothered to look at the results for my state. A supposedly Red state. The Republicans that won eeked out those wins with a few points over 50%. The Democrats, almost all incumbents in the cities, ALL won their races with right around 80%. It was after seeing this with my own eyes that when the 2020 cheating started coming out I was like, yep, they've been installing them for a long time.
Yep. And they have become more brazen about it as they consolidated power. If they would have stuck with the small margins of victory we might have never noticed. But greed for power and the appearance of power always brings down the leftists. They can't help themselves and they are too inbred or arrogant to be self-aware.
Good observations1
Anyone can take a look at the margins of victory (computer data on election day eve) in any state and calculate the margins of victory. You may notice a pattern if you go race by race even down into the largest counties. I believe the NY Times data and Reuters data may be the same source, so grab that if you can.
It appears the machines are doing the manipulation, but I believe they are routing machine vote data through some sort of filter that can further manipulate the data before it gets fed through Reuters to all the MSM outlets. And I suspect they then replace the data on the machine with the modified data via download back to the machine or via their "software updates".
Thanks
Soooo, does this shed any light on guy with hammer in Pelosi’s house?
It may shed some light on why that happened when it did right before the Brazil election. It does appear to be comms of some sort. Most likely to switch up some portion of the Hammer and Scorecard that was used to rig that election.
The best decode I have seen is that some portion of the Brazil rigging got switched over to Meta/Facebook servers/software backup as their [Lula's] original method had been exposed and was being monitored. Almost certainly the backup method was ALSO being monitored by the Brazilian military who has Constitutional authority to audit all Brazilian Presidential elections.