Think about how this benefits the cabal. It gives them the excuse for pushing global immigration since "birth rates are below replacement rate" in every major nation as well as making it easier for them to cheat because they have massive pools of non existent and dead voters to pull from.
This really Isn't complicated or difficult, rather it's straightforward. We know from the last several elections how they cheat, and we know that a large portion of the voting population is either dead or doesn't really exist. So it' stands to reason that a large portion of our actual census designated population is actually either dead or fake and part of the voter fraud machine.
Not only does this allow this to cheat more easily, but it also allows them to push fears via demographic and population manipulation. For example, "The USA has birth rates below replacement value so we have to increase immigration to prevent demographic collapse". Well if a large percentage of the population doesn't really exist, then this MSM pushed "fear" is just like global warming. It's fake, it's pushed by false "experts", and the reality is that we have nothing to worry about.
We probably have more than enough live births annually to meet replacement rates several times over, but because of our inflated population statistics it seems like we're far below that rate. Thus enabling government entities to push for mass immigration, which of course results in political and social unrest as we've seen.
This applies to other things to. Think about the absurd amounts of money that is laundered by giving social benefits like social security to dead and/or non existent "citizens". Yet another reason for them to do this, since it's another way to cripple our nations and cause social unrest by applying false pressure ot the system.
The last point I can think of off the top of my head is this would also help the cabal further splinter us and pit us against each other. "The white demographic is decreasing" for example. This is a lie for multiple reasons, but the applicable one here would be how they apply false increases to every demographic but whites to as to make it appear like there is a smaller percentage of whites in the USA. You can apply this to religion as well for the record.
Just something I've been thinking on for a while, figured I'd share it and let others discuss it since I think this theory has quite a bit of merit.
You are extrapolating the inaccuracy of the census, which is known, and has always been known, to the conclusion that the population is crashing. That's a big leap. The general way such conclusions are made is not from the census but from vital statistics. We may soon see a crash as the vaccine effects kick in and mortality rises, but it hasn't quite happened yet.
Defending it with visuals of football stadiums is a bit weak, imo, because it is also well known that the ability to estimate the size of things, the brightness of lights, the loudness of sounds, etc.is limited by our brains and is not a linear function, so the more of something there is, the more there has to be for us to notice the difference (Weber's Law, the "just noticeable difference"). You do know the capacity of the stadiums and you could use photographs to "count" the crowds, the same way the park services count crowds in Washington. You can't tell from a picture without context because you don't know the size of the stadium, therefore the density of the crowds is meaningless.You can only know the density looks similar (but what if these stadiums are filled with skinny Iittle asians instead of fat Americans?)
It also has always been true that censuses happen to have a political tilt, although that tilt can be somewhat measured by applying the census figures to other measures, like reported births and deaths. Supporting data like this are how the Census Bureau knows the count is off and estimates, based on their followup survey, how far off they are. It is still a statistical construct with a margin of error.The 2020 census was probably fraudulent to some degree as it just happened that all the undercounts were in Red states and the overcounts were in Blue states. What a coinkydink. Still, census.gov defends it as more accurate than the 2010 census--under Obama--no way that was accurate because he was counting illegals.
I'm arguing from observation of actual growth and traffic, which is also bound to be somewhat inaccurate, but at least anyone can go out and look and measure the miles of civilization. I don't need to know the exact numbers, at least in the west, to know there are more people and less open space. Whether that growth continues could also be observed by anyone, and by monitoring real estate projects. Interestingly, the country west of the Mississippi has only 40% of the US population. Someone as familiar with the east should comment on perceived density.
.....What in the?....I'm convinced no one here has actually read my post. I'm NOT saying that the population is crashing, nor am I trying to say that our population isn't growing. I'm saying that it's plausible that numbers have been manipulated to make it seem like we have more people than we really do for a variety of reasons and end goals.
Literally no one in this thread has actually argued against anything I've said thus far other than trying to say "there's no evidence" which isn't a defense against a theory, and trying to argue I'm saying something I'm not.
Since we're still talking about Phoenix, yes it's obviously grown, and the Phoenix metro has grown even more. I have not argued that once in this entire thread. All I've suggested is that it's feasible and plausible that the official statistics have been manipulated to some degree for politically corrupt reasons.
Honestly I don't know if I worded it weirdly, in which case it's my fault I suppose, or everyone here has their head up their butt.
Either way, I have literally not once argued that these places aren't growing and growing massively. Going off the 50 year timeline you've put forth from your own personal experience and assuming the 20% variable I threw out earlier, the Phoenix metro has still almost quadrupled in that 50 year time line. That's a MASSIVE increase, all while accounting for 20% of the official population being fake and/or dead but still being counted and the fact that, as you pointed out, the entire metro has grown exponentially in the last 50 years.
I'm honestly at my wits end here trying to convey what I'm saying since everyone seems to want to argue on something I didn't say or claim.
All right, the census is biased and has been from the start for two reasons: the citizens being counted are a moving target which makes perfect accuracy impossible,, and politicians want to increase their clout in the House. But the latter can work can work as well by overcounting their side as by undercounting the opposition. It isn't going to be all undercounting, although undercounting would be harder to catch, I think. The Dems got the idea of importing and counting illegals at least as much for this reason as for their possible votes, I suspect more so. This is where the population replacement fear is coming from, imo, and when you see, for years, news that "x many illegals have entered this year" it's hard not to feel replaced.