https://rumble.com/v1r2ts2--live-daily-show-louder-with-crowder.html
It’s maniacal what’s happening with this stuff, we need to get an unvaxxed blood bank together if we really care about our loved ones, I have a baby on the way I’m gonna have to find a way to store my unvaxed blood for time of birth and my lady will need blood available as well.
I’m not looking to get rich even though I’m poor but this is a real thing that needs to be capitalized on. We need to protect the unvaxxed.
As mentioned in this video, a man who was unvaccinated but received transfusions did indeed die and these growths were found in his arteries.
I'm sure there's a record. My state has one, and mentions national standards. 🤦♀️
https://health.mo.gov/living/wellness/immunizations/showmevax/
This is HIPAA-protected data. You would need to be an "authorized health care organization" to gain access to this DB. Which means you would have to play by their rules in all ways. As such, you and all your employees would have to be jabbed if you were to be "playing along". Your organization would be deemed a "health threat" if all employees were unjabbed and would not be able to be "licensed" by them.
I was thinking more along the lines of some sort of post blood draw chemical test but I don't know what it would be. A D-Dimer test would be the closest thing I could think of but not sure if it would be accurate. Would require some significant testing ahead of time at the very least.
Bottom line, you'd have to create this organization outside the dominant health-care paradigm to be viable. The last thing the entrenched powers want is people discriminating against jabbed blood.
Become a school or daycare facility as well? 😂
But seriously, good point. People donating would have to sign a HIPAA release authorizing medical records disclosure for continuation of care, if needed, and I'd think that would allow them to disclose vaccination status. Not a lawyer, but did work in medical records for a bit.
Also, there are titer tests for other vaccines. That's only if someone is still showing immunity, so if the vaccine didn't take, or it's been a long time, then they wouldn't have the titers. Looks like they can test for the COVID vaxx as well. And studies show low immunity response, surprise...
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20221006/Scientists-investigate-the-antibody-titers-post-mRNA-COVID-19-booster-vaccine-in-the-elderly.aspx
Yeah, the difficulty is being first authorized to access said DB as a company. I suppose you could operate this as a side gig if you were already operating as some other licensed organization with healthcare concerns on the periphery. Either way though, when the authorities caught on to what you were doing they'd certainly shut you down. There needs to be a way to operate outside the establishment to pull this off in my estimation as the very basis of an unvaxxed blood bank is obviously a giant middle finger aimed at the medical cartel.
As to the titer tests, I'm afraid they're all bunk as "antibodies" are not what establishment medicine thinks they are. Put simply, all they're doing is detecting excess cellular breakdown activity, which recruits antibody globulins to act as a glue and as garbage removal system. As such, should a person take 4 separate titer tests for say measles, polio, Covid, HIV, etc. they would all return a positive result, regardless of whether the person had one or more of those jabs recently if they were in some stage of cellular repair/breakdown for any myriad of reasons.
And "immunity" is a lie as there is nothing to be immune to and therefore there is no such thing as an "immune system".
The lies run deep! But I still like the idea of an unjabbed blood bank. Somebody is going to figure it out and make it happen. I just can't think of the best way to pull it off at the moment.
Could you create a membership "club" where a small fee is paid to be a member, and membership has to be approved through certain criteria - testing blood to make sure it's not tainted? Wouldn't that throw the HIPAA red tape out the window?
Yeah, a PMO would get you beyond their corporate legal tentacles. But then the next problem is, all hospitals/doctors would almost certainly BAN your product from being used. Presumably a person could claim they drew their own blood ahead of time when presenting it to the healthcare facility but that would be lying and lead to a whole other set of problems.
This is trickier than I first imagined. The key issues include:
I don't presently see a simple way around any of them at the moment.
It may take large masses and loud voices before any substantive changes would be made to their draconian rules.