Avatar
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz
3h
Replying to @tracybeanz
The parties have been going back and forth. As we know, the judge has made two exceedingly rare rulings in this case; first, he granted expedited discovery. For details you can read this: uncoverdc.com/2022/09/06/rulin
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz
3h
Replying to @tracybeanz
Then, once discovery started coming in, the Plaintiff attorneys couldn’t believe what they were reading, and petitioned the court for expedited depositions. His order declared that several claims the Plaintiffs had made about social media censorship had already been PROVEN. Unheard of, but true. The claims were PROVEN, and there is an active and wide ranging effort to censor and target Americans based on their THOUGHTS and speech.
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz
3h
Replying to @tracybeanz
If you haven’t yet, please read this: uncoverdc.com/2022/10/23/bombs
This article details everything in the judges order, and it’s something.
@tracybeanz
4h
Replying to @tracybeanz
This piece was written before “The Intercept” wrote their piece. TAhe Intercept piece that went viral was based on the discovery in THIS CASE.
So, once the judge ordered expedited discovery, the government shenanigans began.
Nov 02, 2022, 1:56 PM
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz
3h
Replying to @tracybeanz
The government (Defendants in this case) started filing motions to stop people from being deposed, and in other cases to delay it due to circumstances they outline that are inane and ridiculous. I will detail these in this thread, because I feel like a deep dive follow of this case is something everyone needs.
Then, they filed a mandamus in the appellate court to stop the depositions altogether. The Plaintiffs (MO and LA) consented to a SHORT delay in deposition, bringing them to early Dec.
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz
3h
Replying to @tracybeanz
He ruled that their request for a stay was DENIED, which means that no matter what happens in the appellate court, they must sit for these depositions, because as the judge so eloquently writes, the HARM they are causing to Americans far supersedes any of their nonsense excuses. I am about to do a run down on this 7 page order now, so you have the sauce, but that is a summary.
MOST. IMPORTANT. CASE. IN. DECADES for Free speech and government overreach. Keep reading.
https://truthsocial.com/@tracybeanz/posts/109276198378807627
Does this work?
Works for me
Avatar Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz 3h Replying to @tracybeanz The parties have been going back and forth. As we know, the judge has made two exceedingly rare rulings in this case; first, he granted expedited discovery. For details you can read this: uncoverdc.com/2022/09/06/rulin
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz 3h Replying to @tracybeanz Then, once discovery started coming in, the Plaintiff attorneys couldn’t believe what they were reading, and petitioned the court for expedited depositions. His order declared that several claims the Plaintiffs had made about social media censorship had already been PROVEN. Unheard of, but true. The claims were PROVEN, and there is an active and wide ranging effort to censor and target Americans based on their THOUGHTS and speech.
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz 3h Replying to @tracybeanz If you haven’t yet, please read this: uncoverdc.com/2022/10/23/bombs
This article details everything in the judges order, and it’s something.
@tracybeanz 4h Replying to @tracybeanz This piece was written before “The Intercept” wrote their piece. TAhe Intercept piece that went viral was based on the discovery in THIS CASE.
So, once the judge ordered expedited discovery, the government shenanigans began. Nov 02, 2022, 1:56 PM
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz 3h Replying to @tracybeanz The government (Defendants in this case) started filing motions to stop people from being deposed, and in other cases to delay it due to circumstances they outline that are inane and ridiculous. I will detail these in this thread, because I feel like a deep dive follow of this case is something everyone needs.
Then, they filed a mandamus in the appellate court to stop the depositions altogether. The Plaintiffs (MO and LA) consented to a SHORT delay in deposition, bringing them to early Dec.
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz 3h Replying to @tracybeanz He ruled that their request for a stay was DENIED, which means that no matter what happens in the appellate court, they must sit for these depositions, because as the judge so eloquently writes, the HARM they are causing to Americans far supersedes any of their nonsense excuses. I am about to do a run down on this 7 page order now, so you have the sauce, but that is a summary.
MOST. IMPORTANT. CASE. IN. DECADES for Free speech and government overreach. Keep reading.
Tracy Beanz@tracybeanz 3h Replying to @tracybeanz Here is a link to the order so you can read along: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520.104.0.pdf