I noticed this yesterday. I don't know when they changed the talking point (anybody know?). But the question now is, when will they say, "No evidence the voter fraud would have changed the results of the election", and how long after that will they say, "Well, it's obviously too late to do anything about the fraudulent 2020 election".
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Give things a little more time and you might change your opinion on it. You think the 2,000 mules data was just coincidental?
Um, yes, until they release the complete data set for all to comb through, instead of just relying on "No trust us, there is only one way to read the data and we read it correctly so you don't need to, and we definitely helped solve a murder". And the fact that they had the ability to cull locational data points like libraries and McDonalds and other multi-use sites that temporarily housed ballot boxes, and didn't? Threw all that data noise in there? That tells me the data without multi-use sites was not compelling enough - that there wasn't enough evidence going by just ballot boxes, and so the data and point had to be weakened by roping in a category of places people have very good reasons for visiting multiple of in a day. And the filmmakers just assumed whoever watched it wouldn't notice or wouldn't care.
And this is to say nothing of how, as a privacy advocate, the very fact they were able to just purchase huge swaths of individual American movement patterns (and thus, ANYONE IN THE WORLD WITH NOT EVEN THAT MUCH MONEY RELATIVELY SPEAKING COULD DO THE SAME) should be very concerning and an integral part of the conversation around this film/book.
I stand by what I said, until a better data set comes out. Until then, your assertions are as believable as 2020's "If Biden wins in November, the media will suddenly stop talking about COVID!"
P.S. I want to be clear - I'm not sure the 2k Mules data SHOULD be released in full to the public, due to privacy concerns. Since it's geotracking data, and most people spend at least some portion of every day in their house, the data could be easily used by anyone to pinpoint the movements of specific people. But without any raw data released, the findings as they were conveyed are at best questionable. It's a sticky Catch-22, for sure.
The 2000 mules data is just one of many avenues of voter fraud during the 2020 election. (and the personal info associated with each tracking record could be removed prior to any release)
How? It's tracking data, and people spend time in their houses. For the data to be precise enough to show visiting specific ballot box drop-offs, it would necessarily show where these people sleep. They had half a million data sets from Georgia alone! Are you suggesting they individually edit out time spent at homes hundreds of thousands of times?
This is all to say nothing of the fact that when vote-by-mail is an option, houses also count as ballot drop-offs sites. And that even if they could remove that sensitive data - anyone with the capital can just buy that incredibly sensitive data shouldn't that be a larger concern???