I believe the real reason people have their newborns sons circumcised is because a group of people need access to foreskin? I really don't understand why this procedure is common place.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (154)
sorted by:
Nothing unhygienic about not circumcising. I recall the hospital assuming you’d have it done if you had a boy and I looked at the nurse like she was mad, which is when she realized her assumption was wrong. My grandmother wasn’t even asked, it was done as a matter of course (you know, back when women were often tied down during twilight labor). Bottom line, after doing my research I consider it male genital mutilation.