Not an argument for or against, your comment made me think of an old Friend of mine who was uncircumsized through most of college.

He was not originally from the u.s., and he said American girls were almost always turned off by being uncut which diminished his confidence quite a bit (but when he would take trips back to Europe, girls weren't turned off by it). Ended up getting it removed, said it was way worth it but did have a noticeable decline in sensation. He said it was a double edged sword, on one edge "he could fuck like a porn star" (he said he didn't understand how guys in porn could last so long until post-cut) and was no longer a 'two pump chump' but on the other loss of sensation range took some adjustment.

He said on trips back to Europe that none of the girls minded or cared that he was circumcised like how American girls thought being uncircumcised was a turn off.

One comment that he made was that also stuck with me was that the "environmental conditions" down there were much cleaner, where as before moisture buildup, smell, buildup (he was a very active athlete) etc... not that this guy was unclean or not hygienic as he was, but still different.

The ironic thing as far as I can tell is that had he never moved to the u.s. he most likely would never have gotten circumcised since girls over saw that as the norm but being in America with it not being the norm, just eroded his confidence enough to get it done.