To count votes appropriately, the machine is necessary to weight the individual votes so the desired outcome is achieved without the use of outside votes that are vulnerable to fraud detection. 100 real people can vote and the machines will adjust the number for each candidate until the predetermined results are met. If the fractional skimming is overwhelmed by too many votes for the wrong candidate then the flipping module is activated. If your desire candidate is a mush brain pedo crook and doesn’t have the support to hide the skimming and flipping then the machine can print test sets of ballots that can be fed back into the machine to buffer the landslide of the undesirable candidate. This presents a problem with total counts so human intervention is best. If team players can identify and discard votes for the undesirable candidate before they are scanned then the vote totals can be matched to number of actual voters. In rare instances where your desired candidate is a sociopath that wants to destroy the economy, genocide their people, and start ww3 to cover their theft and deviancy, the county may need to be halted until fresh ballots are filled out for all the people who didn’t vote. If the vote manufacturers are off site then transport and delivery are risky. The manufacturer believes this is largely a theoretical problem since nobody is that bad.
To deliver software upgrades, I suppose.
Real question, why have voting machines?
To count votes appropriately, the machine is necessary to weight the individual votes so the desired outcome is achieved without the use of outside votes that are vulnerable to fraud detection. 100 real people can vote and the machines will adjust the number for each candidate until the predetermined results are met. If the fractional skimming is overwhelmed by too many votes for the wrong candidate then the flipping module is activated. If your desire candidate is a mush brain pedo crook and doesn’t have the support to hide the skimming and flipping then the machine can print test sets of ballots that can be fed back into the machine to buffer the landslide of the undesirable candidate. This presents a problem with total counts so human intervention is best. If team players can identify and discard votes for the undesirable candidate before they are scanned then the vote totals can be matched to number of actual voters. In rare instances where your desired candidate is a sociopath that wants to destroy the economy, genocide their people, and start ww3 to cover their theft and deviancy, the county may need to be halted until fresh ballots are filled out for all the people who didn’t vote. If the vote manufacturers are off site then transport and delivery are risky. The manufacturer believes this is largely a theoretical problem since nobody is that bad.