The problem with "powering" this tech with ambient EM waves from nearby radio emitters is that the elevated electrical properties it induces in our biological system already causes clotting via rouleau formation. Notably, this happens already without the technology linked above being implemented - study is from 2005).
The study in the link is for the 1.8GHz range (1G) EMF radiation. 5G is a much higher frequency (28-39GHz) so I'm unsure whether or not that would affect the body similarly or differently. It bothers me more though that even asking the question isn't "allowed" without being called insane by people who get mad when I ride a bicycle without a helmet.
Does a BBC subsidiary qualify as a crazy conspiracy site?
Here is one version of the technology that is supposedly not tested on humans yet:
https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/the-injectable-nanosensor-that-will-one-day-read-your-thoughts/
The problem with "powering" this tech with ambient EM waves from nearby radio emitters is that the elevated electrical properties it induces in our biological system already causes clotting via rouleau formation. Notably, this happens already without the technology linked above being implemented - study is from 2005).
The study in the link is for the 1.8GHz range (1G) EMF radiation. 5G is a much higher frequency (28-39GHz) so I'm unsure whether or not that would affect the body similarly or differently. It bothers me more though that even asking the question isn't "allowed" without being called insane by people who get mad when I ride a bicycle without a helmet.