Yes - Restoring the Republic will destroy their democracy

Aka D.C. the foreign territory. Their den of thieves or swamp if you prefer. Buncha farquads.

🎶ain't there nothin' I can take🎶

So, oddly enough, there's a little trick done with the words "majority" and "minority."

In limiting the context to numerical value, majority means "a greater number." Or perhaps it could be a viewpoint that has been in power temporally for a "majority" of history. Or perhaps a viewpoint is just "major" (dictionary: main or more important) as in dominant.

But remember, some people are also categorized as "minorities" as well, and, despite their physical numbers today, may well be the "majority" numerically soon nonetheless.

From the wiki - "Minority (philosopy)":

Minority (French: minorité) is a philosophical concept developed by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in their books Kafka: Towards a Minor Literature (1975), A Thousand Plateaus (1980), and elsewhere. In these texts, they criticize the concept of "majority". For Deleuze and Guattari, "becoming-minor(itarian)" is primarily an ethical action, one of the becomings one is affected by when avoiding "becoming-fascist". They argued further that the concept of a "people", when invoked by subordinate groups or those aligned with them, always refers to a minority, whatever its numerical power might be.

Sound familiar? Let's move on:

…

The example of patriarchy provides an illustration of how the concept of "minority" is used: while there may be more women than men numerically, in Deleuze and Guattari's terms, which are sensitive to relations of power, men still constitute the majority whereas women form a minority. Thus the concept of "becoming-minor" converges with that of "becoming-woman" (as they say, "everyone has to 'become-woman', even women..."), "becoming-animal", "becoming-molecular", "becoming-imperceptible" and ultimately, "becoming-revolutionary". Each type of affective becoming marks a new phase of a larger process that Deleuze and Guattari call deterritorialization.

The context now is that the "majority" view (white, cis, hetero, male, straight, Euro, Christian, dominant, traditional, historical) is no longer working for some people, so now it's time for a "minoritarian" view to be the new "minority-majority" rule.