I agree. This post has only two declarative sentences. The rest are questions. I don't grasp the logic of "Oh, this can't be Q. He isn't telling us 'not enough'." How can he tell us anything new, if we insist that it not deviate from the past? I think somebody wants to take a ride in a time machine, "back to the Good Old Q Posts" when we were all watching a movie, and could argue about when/if the Storm would happen!