It’s not “actually” Pascal’s Triangle. It’s both. The tetrahedral numbers are one row of the PT, right after the triangular numbers, the positive whole numbers, and the infinite row of 1’s.
The pattern OP noticed is more specific; the other vertical rows and slices of the PT are irrelevant here. But you’re welcome to prove me wrong.
Yes.
It's actually Pascals Triangle...
Old news.
I've been spreading this a while!
https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-verizon&sxsrf=ALiCzsYOTu3cj5A9X-4GyQnrBBtfSpcnqg:1667875631120&q=djt+god+emperor+4+10+20&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj9x5b0yJ37AhU5jYkEHeGwD-8Q0pQJegQIBhAB&biw=412&bih=777&dpr=2.63#imgrc=mw_U6oCcDbbDzM
As far as we know, that's instruction on how to lay out the Q Clock in a spiraling fashion.
I haven't read any other theories the past several years.
It’s not “actually” Pascal’s Triangle. It’s both. The tetrahedral numbers are one row of the PT, right after the triangular numbers, the positive whole numbers, and the infinite row of 1’s.
The pattern OP noticed is more specific; the other vertical rows and slices of the PT are irrelevant here. But you’re welcome to prove me wrong.
Correct in the sense that one is 3d and the other is 2d
But they are the same in concept
https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.470351003.8928/fmp,x_small,gloss,wall_texture,product,750x1000.u3.jpg
One is 2D (array) and the other is 1D (sequence).
What even is that picture? What’s with the big V and the half circle? What “prophecy”? A lot of irrelevant stuff here
The Arch Angle Michael