I can no longer say that devolution is a theory.
Parts, if not the entirety, are absolutely in place as we speak.
This read completely and totally blew my mind.
On December 7th, 2020 (AFTER the election was stolen) Trump announced the Federal Mission Resilience Strategy which called "to preserve our constitutional form of government under any and all conditions."
The strategy and execution describe the actions needed to create devolved forms of continuity in order to preserve our "constitutional form of government" and ensuring the federal executive branch functions PROPERLY in times of crisis and war.
The crisis is specifically named Covid-19 and cyber attacks, but one could argue the wording could include "Manchurian Candidates."
Again... All of this was put in place AFTER the 2020 election.
It even names who's leading the committees to setup a devolved form of government and their roles.
https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-13
@ElectionEvidence 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
H/T @PatelPatriot : https://t.me/NittyGrittD/24040
Great catch! Thanks for posting!
I'll be interested to read the details of what was done behind the scenes by those implementing all this, in and out of the various organizations in play -- assuming that story is ever told. In particular, how and to what extent they've been able to block, neutralize, or soften the harmful impact of Biden Admin policies, and the areas or instances where they were unsuccessful.
That may not even be the right question, though. Why and how is Biden so clearly both "President" and yet apparently not actually IN the White House, and not able to void or modify Trump's EOs and in fact has RENEWED at least one that would seem to endanger the DS? That and other questions make me believe I'm not seeing the framework in play clearly -- I need a paradigm shift here, I think.