Theory on Lottery Winner:
What if this $1.9 billion lottery was basically about disbursing funds to all the people who helped with the fraud?
What if, normally, day before election its all in the bag and they know whom to disburse?
What if, this time at last moment, they realised its not in the bag, so they are holding off announcing the winner?
Just spitballing.
What are the odds a woman working at a grocery store who was savvy enough to create a trust fund to collect the winnings to preserve her anonymity would then reveal her identity 11 years later to an Oklahoma City newspaper reporter?
And then what are the odds she just happened to randomly name her trust the Zorro Trust?
This story is air tight. After all, not everything’s a mystery. Sometimes, it’s just a coincidence. Quit thinking.
Those trusts are commonly setup by lawyers for people who win the lottery. They don't have to be geniuses; just smart enough to seek help, which is the received wisdom anyways. She didn't reveal herself. They asked around the neighborhood and found someone who knew her. It makes sense she would tell a few people, particularly at work. Maybe she didn't want to be just disappear on coworkers or at least wanted to let them know why she bailed. it makes sense she'd tell someone.
For all we know, her dog's name is Zorro. My point is: the odds here aren't important. We came upon this case in the first place based on the trust's name. There are thousands of these, but this one was isolated for the potential connection to Epstein.
Are you doing the "askshually" thing in an effort to corroborate a MSM outlet's completely crazy answer to a perfectly logical question?
This isn't Reddit, fren. No need to give Bloomberg the reach around.