Why are folks getting all worked up about someone conceding (or not conceding) an election? Conceding doesn't mean if the numbers change to your favor (because of fraud or cheating) you still wouldn't win the election, would it? It seems to me that conceding (or not) is irrelevant.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Yes, see the recent SCOTUS ruling in regards to Ritter getting fucked in PA:
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ritter-v-migliori-2/
Wrap your head around this one. Court rules that PA cheated Ritter out of his race. But they render the case moot. Why? Not because PA illegally installed his opponent [official reason given] but because Ritter foolishly conceded.