As bummed as I was that we didn’t sweep all elections on Tuesday and still saw massive fraud. I later realized that as Kash pointed out we got the House and on track to gain the Senate despite their cheating efforts. We don’t need to hold those by a large margin just enough for us to have control is the key at same time we still lost major races that showed that election fraud is still on going. Imagine if we swept all races there would be no sign of election fraud and no reason for military to come in and investigate and expose. Truth is military could not have come in for 2020 election because optics would be horrible for Trump. Media would label him a dictator trying to steal the election and normies would fall for it. But 2022 the optics are perfect for military investigation and arrests. Trump hasn’t been in White House for 2 years they can’t put any of it on him. As far as they and normies know, he has no control over military. And Maricopa being a shit show is necessary for Lake to have cause to look into the election. I think AZ will be the trigger that gets the ball rolling on arrests and military intervention in our elections and eventual decertification of 2020
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I think it's definitely worth acknowledging that a red sweep would have legitimised a fraudulent system. Then again a red sweep would only occur if the system wasn't fraudulent. Probably a circular argument now that I think about it.
agree!
I'm circling with you.
As I look to the center point as I circle, though, it seems to me that this election is and will always be a test of INTEGRITY.
In a show of Voter INTEGRITY, Voters came out on election day in person. It was a huge turnout on election day for in person voting for a midterm. This kinda contests the EAC push for mail only voting. Voters showed that they thought this election was important enough to come to the polls in person.
Irregularities and alleged fraud also showed up in this election. The RED wave/tsunami may have been covered (hidden) by the success of the irregularities/fraud, which was quickly covered (reported) by (complicit?) media.
Now, a test shows the good stuff and the bad. The TRUTH becomes more apparent in the circling, imho. As I consider the power of in person on election day voting, there is no ignoring authentic PRESENCE.
One more observation as I circle back to the "RED wave/tsunami". I wonder how much the mere mention of this prognostication affected the turnout of both in person voters and irregularities/"fraud". We don't know whether all these in person voters on election day voted red or blue, if the fraudulent votes were discarded as they should have been--if the counting had INTEGRITY. And it shouldn't matter whether legitimate votes were red or blue.
I now have a label for the center point that I have been circling around. The center point is TRUST. It is hard to trust something that is not trustworthy. Still struggling on that.
Boy, did your comment provoke thinking n me. I gotta get another cup of coffee now and ponder some more.
EDIT:
One more thing. If the vote counts include fraudulent ballots, what is certified in this election? Oh, the circles.