Never said I want civil war, e.g. rebellion. Quite on the contrary, actually. See my activity history. To restate a summary of it, the enemy wants civil war because that gives them justification for authoritarian crackdown.
What I want, and believe the vast majority of people here, and throughout the country want, is for our Oath taking government, courts and military to do their job.
DJT was the lawful POTUS in 2020. Under his watch, a foreign aided rebellion was allowed to occur, resulting in countless civil and human rights violations against law abiding citizens of the USA, and culminating in stolen elections and an unlawful occupation of our state and federal governments.
Again, DJT was POTUS. It was his solemn responsibility to defend the nation and protect the Constitution. The alleged plan is that what happened was allowed to happen, because it was a sting operation, under his command. If that is true, then the actions were justified. However, if that is not true, then DJT is the equivalent of James Buchanan, not Abraham Lincoln. One let the Republic devolve into chaos. The other saved the Republic.
So which is it? Successful sting or grift? Is DJT Lincoln or Buchanan?
Until there are arrests and tribunals, the jury is still out. That's not dooming, but wisely cautious optimism.
Fair assessment of Q being COIN. Agreed.
Never said I want civil war, e.g. rebellion. Quite on the contrary, actually. See my activity history. To restate a summary of it, the enemy wants civil war because that gives them justification for authoritarian crackdown.
What I want, and believe the vast majority of people here, and throughout the country want, is for our Oath taking government, courts and military to do their job.
DJT was the lawful POTUS in 2020. Under his watch, a foreign aided rebellion was allowed to occur, resulting in countless civil and human rights violations against law abiding citizens of the USA, and culminating in stolen elections and an unlawful occupation of our state and federal governments.
Again, DJT was POTUS. It was his solemn responsibility to defend the nation and protect the Constitution. The alleged plan is that what happened was allowed to happen, because it was a sting operation, under his command. If that is true, then the actions were justified. However, if that is not true, then DJT is the equivalent of James Buchanan, not Abraham Lincoln. One let the Republic devolve into chaos. The other saved the Republic.
So which is it? Successful sting or grift? Is DJT Lincoln or Buchanan?
Until there are arrests and tribunals, the jury is still out. That's not dooming, but wisely cautious optimism.