Is AZ Katie Hobbs padding NEW VOTES with "INACTIVE VOTERS"? ...SEE Nov. 10th 8:30 pm (Pacific) TOTAL voted (at top) PLUS EST. REMAINING...and it continues Nov. 11 😡🔥
(media.greatawakening.win)
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Brilliant - thank you u/PatriotLady1
How long did this take you to produce? I bet that these would come in handy for PA, NV, GA, MI and many other states as well.
my pleasure....eeeeeeeveryone needs to keep a vigil on the #'s and the "funny stuff" that doesn't look right...esp. since New Hampsire just had this...
"ANOTHER DEM "MIRACLE"...Maggie Hassan WINS 1,100 Votes FROM TOWN with Population UNDER 700 ...🔥😡🔥
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...e-hassan-wins-1100-votes-town-population-700/
have 'em for PA, ...UNFORTUNATELY, THE -79,607 LOSS IN OVERALL TOTAL VOTES / discrepancy on Nov. 10th (what a coincidence to AZ, huh)...**doesn't allow for a gain (in the 94,036 left to count) ..TO OVERCOME the 760,881 lead by Shapiro over Mastriano.... **
For sure, PA got the jump on over-allocated mail-ins, much more so than AZ was able to.
I'm sure it's got nothing to do that the current AG (Shapiro) who worked on reinforcing the election fraud laws, is the same person using those "laws" to cheat in the election.
So we've got an obvious election fraud in 2020 being protected by the AG for 2+ years, who is now using the exact same tactics to ensure that he and his Senate partner (a man who cannot speak English, ruined a small town as Mayor and lived in his parent's basement until he was 50) can guarantee a stolen victory with manufactured mail-ins.
I bet that the statewide elections would be 65/35 in favor of Oz/Mastriano if they weren't able to cheat.