It seems to me that many White Hat moves are initially introduced to the public as wins for the Black Hats, but then those wins consistently seem to deteriorate into losses for them. To me this almost seems like a strategy to get them into the public eye. Jussie Smollett was like this. Hydroxychloroquine. Zelensky phone call. Avenatti. Even the Mueller Report. The corporate media tries to amplify the initial win and downplay the later loss, and they do that fairly well, but this contrast is also what triggers awakening, because each new story gives more people a chance to experience that flip. And for each person, the story flip that finally woke them up is different, so that’s why they keep setting up the same pattern over and over again. Corporate media keeps taking the bait because that’s their fuel to keep the charade going, but the more they keep the charade going, the more people wake up, and once people see through one charade, others follow. When revealing the truth means showing how many lies people believe in, how else could this be accomplished? There wouldn’t be a way to select one lie to expose that would effectively dismantle all the others since this process seems to be so subjective, and it has to work through each person’s individual psychological defenses and financial/social incentives.