Thought just occurred to me when I saw someone else post about how the bill would revoke tax exempt status from Churches that don't comply with their disgusting views. This would obviously set off tens of thousands of lawsuits (maybe even hundreds of thousands or millions) all over the country. The political crap storm this would set off would be like nothing else we've seen in a long time.
Suffice to say, it'd get quickly fast tracked to the supreme court. And if I'm right, they'd use this opportunity to not just strike down the bill as unconstitutional, but they'd also make a similar ruling to the recent Roe v Wade reversal and decide it's a state's issue where the federal government has no right to butt in.
Thus, leading to states with trigger laws like Texas, Oklahoma, Idaho, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, etc. to instantly ban gay "marriage" again, and further reversing a lot of the damaging social policies forced onto the general populace over the last 20 or so years.
Of course, this would probably be used to try and push for more conflict (Just like how they did with abortion), but I still see it as a good thing. Besides, Clarence Thomas DID indicate that they'd eventually go after gay "marriage" as it's also a state's rights thing.
This would also finally prove that the majority of people in the US don't support gay "marriage" (remember, even california and new york voted against legalizing gay "marriage" until it was forced on them against their wills via cheating and other shady, illegal, and unconstitutional processes).
If nothing else I see this as one more step in proving that we're not a dying, Godless, morally corrupt nation like the media, politicians, and "pollsters", like to say we are. But rather we're a nation of mostly patriotic, morally upright, Christians who generally speaking oppose most of this crap. I see this as part of the Great Awakening process myself, especially since it's becoming increasingly obvious that God has a personal hand in all of this, at least in regards to the USA.
Feel free to discuss below, but it's just a theory I had come to me. And to be honest, I can see this happening if for no other reason than to try and cause more division and strife with the media fanning artificial flames that apply to less than 5% of the population (if you combine the percentage of gay supporters and gay population together, I figure it's roughly this amount.)
Doubtful when so many disapprove of it. You can still love someone and disapprove of their lifestyle and/or life choices. An unrelated example would be drug addicts or alcoholics. That number jumps up to 70-80% then, and people still disapprove of it despite the fact that nearly 4/5s of all people in the country are related to or know someone with a drug or alcohol problem.
So there's really no correlation between disapproving of someone's lifestyle and loving them. The two are not mutually exclusive. You can do both.
People really need to stop buying into the whole MSM narrative that the majority approve of gays. Between this and the stupid gen Z thing (different topic so I won't go on a tangent), I'm starting to believe people on here are selective in what they want to believe from the MSM, even if it's all still a bunch of lies.
I mean, yes and no? I love all of my fellow man, but I'm not going to tell them whatever sin committing is alright (including homosexuality). Hate the sin, love the sinner. You wouldn't tell you're alcoholic brother that it's ok to have a few drinks would you? Doesn't mean you don't love him, but you're not going to support his self destructive and sinful behavior.
This isn't that different, contrary to what some may say.