SpaceX is as much a fraud as NASA, both laughably fake. That said USSF has far better gear and a hidden mission, for now anyhow.
I'd swear he had his strings cut and is either free to act on his own, or as directed, or just plain been coopted by the WHs. Previous to this last year, he was being puppeteered by someone for sure. You almost never get that kind of wealth without having strings attached.
Poor cgi effects where you can see objects glitch through the astronaut actors on the "space station" or see their wire harnesses or even see them grab their harnesses. They 'float' the same way theater actors 'fly' and the interactions they have with floating objects are cgi. Quite a few compilation videos out there breaking it down if you care to look for em. SpaceX had a mouse wandering around parts of the booster when it was supposedly in mid launch at the edge of space and under high G acceleration.
What the public thinks of as our space program is so pathetic as to be laughable. Green screen cgi BS and actors with wires. You want to see the barest edge of what we actually have, do a bit of research on the TR3-B, watch the videos and if you think we still need rocket motors for space vehicles/launches then there's no helping you. USSF is so advanced it's freaking scary, like USA vs the entire world and we would still win levels of scary.
Interesting. Thanks for replying. My grandfather helped build the first space station during the 60's and 70's and he shared all kinds of space stuff with us as kids. He was a contract engineer with Lockheed Martin and worked at NASA for a time. I'm always interested in this topic, I'll check it out.
SpaceX is as much a fraud as NASA, both laughably fake. That said USSF has far better gear and a hidden mission, for now anyhow.
I'd swear he had his strings cut and is either free to act on his own, or as directed, or just plain been coopted by the WHs. Previous to this last year, he was being puppeteered by someone for sure. You almost never get that kind of wealth without having strings attached.
What do you mean by NASA being fake?
Poor cgi effects where you can see objects glitch through the astronaut actors on the "space station" or see their wire harnesses or even see them grab their harnesses. They 'float' the same way theater actors 'fly' and the interactions they have with floating objects are cgi. Quite a few compilation videos out there breaking it down if you care to look for em. SpaceX had a mouse wandering around parts of the booster when it was supposedly in mid launch at the edge of space and under high G acceleration.
What the public thinks of as our space program is so pathetic as to be laughable. Green screen cgi BS and actors with wires. You want to see the barest edge of what we actually have, do a bit of research on the TR3-B, watch the videos and if you think we still need rocket motors for space vehicles/launches then there's no helping you. USSF is so advanced it's freaking scary, like USA vs the entire world and we would still win levels of scary.
Interesting. Thanks for replying. My grandfather helped build the first space station during the 60's and 70's and he shared all kinds of space stuff with us as kids. He was a contract engineer with Lockheed Martin and worked at NASA for a time. I'm always interested in this topic, I'll check it out.
"You know it's real because it looks fake."