I've brought it up a few times and surprisingly never been banned, but heavily downvoted and called a troll or otherwise berated pretty much every time.
I think honestly people have a hard time reconciling it and because there really is no firm proof of a motivation for this particular action, it's a question that can't be answered to a satisfactory manner, and therefore people don't want to engage.
It's very nice to imagine that this is being done to take down the establishment or to bring out the truth about vaccines in general but if that's the case why do so many people have to die? If patriots are in control, why wouldn't they be able to use the media to disseminate the information instead (particularly if for insurance you take Deltas as a proof, if a news story in WaPo lines up with a Q post from years ago doesn't that mean patriots are in control of WaPo?) - it did wonders for the covid scam as well as many others throughout the past decades, creating an illusion to people that they hold to stronger than even their own perception of reality. So why kill and maim so many? You could argue to break the media's hold on people's view of reality but that would seem contradicted by Trump starting a social media company called Truth.
I do think PatriotLove above is making a similar point, though. Some of us really do want an answer to this lingering question, don't feel alone.
If you look at it in 1D (one dimensional) then you will be 100% correct and Trump is wrong. However I am not undereducated in strategies and I think more at the 4D to 5D level so I disagree with what you said. I consider it quite undereducated. It’s also impossible to make 1D individuals understand 5D deduction. Guess you are at this level forever.
I am always open to possibility (very low probability imho) that Trump could've known his support of covid "vax" would unnecessarily harm many innocents, but alternatively ask yourself, if trump screamed from rooftops that these jabs were experimental and were or could be harmful how than many injuries/deaths do you honestly think would have been saved? I don't use trump to tell me what decisions to make in life. I was well aware of the likely benefits of hydroxychloroquine before trump mentioned for example and when he did mention I was happy he had been aware of this but that's it.
and if you'll argue it impacted the likes of the simple minded Republicans/conservatives/Patriots who might follow anything he says I would argue that this is a fine line...you may convince some percentage to avoid jab but you'll likely lose large percentage who feel this is a crazy bridge too far. and if many were lost the net result is very likely a globalist/WEF paradise where EVERYONE is forced to be vaxxed. the storm sure appears to be working in Patriots favor following Trump's strategy to date.
this is a war my fren and some may not even realize they're sacrificing themselves for it, but the end is not for everyone. stupid decisions and/or an unwillingness to educate one's self has consequences, even death
My two cents... Trump said he had to make the hardest decision of his life, but didn't expand on that. Was he talking about the decision about what to do with the looming Cov vax situation? Here are two options Trump was facing...
Do nothing and allow [them] to proceed with their plan of keeping us in fear and lockdowns for a few years, while he was out of office, until the shots could be FDA-approved, and therefore legally mandated for EVERYONE to be forced to take.
Implement Operation Warp Speed, so the shots would be forced out early, before they could be approved, which means they couldn't legally be mandated.
In hindsight, I'm extremely thankful he pushed option two, because of that I (and close to half the country) was able to avoid the shots. Even though the shots were never approved and couldn't legally be mandated, [they] still tried with all their might to force the shots, as we saw, so you can bet your ass if they had gotten their way (option one) then all of us would be force injected. Thank God that Trump inter-veined.
Now we're entering the stage where the whole world is going to begin discovering the truth, as the non-injected control group remains healthy, while the injected die off over the next few years (the worst of the die off, it is said, will be organ failure from micro-clotting, that is still a couple years away). The death of Pharma and the complete overhaul of the medical establishment is ahead of us. Unfortunately, it had to be this way. You can't tell the people, they have to be shown.
Unlike other undereducated, there’s no need to bring one self to the level of the undereducated. That would be foolish. You chose the foolish way and I understand why an undereducated would choose that.
Your repeated use of the word undereducated has all the trappings of someone attempting to seem more intellectual than they are. But feel free to continue on your high road of being so "educated" that you deem others so unworthy you don't even attempt explaining your ideas, oh enlightened one
Literally mentioned every week.
I've brought it up a few times and surprisingly never been banned, but heavily downvoted and called a troll or otherwise berated pretty much every time.
I think honestly people have a hard time reconciling it and because there really is no firm proof of a motivation for this particular action, it's a question that can't be answered to a satisfactory manner, and therefore people don't want to engage.
It's very nice to imagine that this is being done to take down the establishment or to bring out the truth about vaccines in general but if that's the case why do so many people have to die? If patriots are in control, why wouldn't they be able to use the media to disseminate the information instead (particularly if for insurance you take Deltas as a proof, if a news story in WaPo lines up with a Q post from years ago doesn't that mean patriots are in control of WaPo?) - it did wonders for the covid scam as well as many others throughout the past decades, creating an illusion to people that they hold to stronger than even their own perception of reality. So why kill and maim so many? You could argue to break the media's hold on people's view of reality but that would seem contradicted by Trump starting a social media company called Truth.
I do think PatriotLove above is making a similar point, though. Some of us really do want an answer to this lingering question, don't feel alone.
I hear you. I can't understand it. It does put pebbles on the side of the balance that says we are repeating history and genocide is next.
Make the best plans.
If you look at it in 1D (one dimensional) then you will be 100% correct and Trump is wrong. However I am not undereducated in strategies and I think more at the 4D to 5D level so I disagree with what you said. I consider it quite undereducated. It’s also impossible to make 1D individuals understand 5D deduction. Guess you are at this level forever.
I am always open to possibility (very low probability imho) that Trump could've known his support of covid "vax" would unnecessarily harm many innocents, but alternatively ask yourself, if trump screamed from rooftops that these jabs were experimental and were or could be harmful how than many injuries/deaths do you honestly think would have been saved? I don't use trump to tell me what decisions to make in life. I was well aware of the likely benefits of hydroxychloroquine before trump mentioned for example and when he did mention I was happy he had been aware of this but that's it.
and if you'll argue it impacted the likes of the simple minded Republicans/conservatives/Patriots who might follow anything he says I would argue that this is a fine line...you may convince some percentage to avoid jab but you'll likely lose large percentage who feel this is a crazy bridge too far. and if many were lost the net result is very likely a globalist/WEF paradise where EVERYONE is forced to be vaxxed. the storm sure appears to be working in Patriots favor following Trump's strategy to date.
this is a war my fren and some may not even realize they're sacrificing themselves for it, but the end is not for everyone. stupid decisions and/or an unwillingness to educate one's self has consequences, even death
You get it, Socrates, thanks for posting.
My two cents... Trump said he had to make the hardest decision of his life, but didn't expand on that. Was he talking about the decision about what to do with the looming Cov vax situation? Here are two options Trump was facing...
Do nothing and allow [them] to proceed with their plan of keeping us in fear and lockdowns for a few years, while he was out of office, until the shots could be FDA-approved, and therefore legally mandated for EVERYONE to be forced to take.
Implement Operation Warp Speed, so the shots would be forced out early, before they could be approved, which means they couldn't legally be mandated.
In hindsight, I'm extremely thankful he pushed option two, because of that I (and close to half the country) was able to avoid the shots. Even though the shots were never approved and couldn't legally be mandated, [they] still tried with all their might to force the shots, as we saw, so you can bet your ass if they had gotten their way (option one) then all of us would be force injected. Thank God that Trump inter-veined.
Now we're entering the stage where the whole world is going to begin discovering the truth, as the non-injected control group remains healthy, while the injected die off over the next few years (the worst of the die off, it is said, will be organ failure from micro-clotting, that is still a couple years away). The death of Pharma and the complete overhaul of the medical establishment is ahead of us. Unfortunately, it had to be this way. You can't tell the people, they have to be shown.
You just sound undereducated.
my dude, i doubt you even play real chess, much less metaphorical chess.
That seems like a good way to avoid presenting an argument and avoiding a debate while patting yourself on the back for it
Unlike other undereducated, there’s no need to bring one self to the level of the undereducated. That would be foolish. You chose the foolish way and I understand why an undereducated would choose that.
Your repeated use of the word undereducated has all the trappings of someone attempting to seem more intellectual than they are. But feel free to continue on your high road of being so "educated" that you deem others so unworthy you don't even attempt explaining your ideas, oh enlightened one