It makes sense to do all this in order to gain the trust of people like us. Let us be aware of the current darkness in the world so when somebody comes in and promises their version of light, we will follow. What if their version of light is simply a greater form of darkness? I hope it is not true, but it makes sense as a viable option.
It seems like a pretty insane strategy to me. How many people are closer to submission to the globalist agenda before Trump and after Trump?
Doesn’t it seem like if they had done HRC vs. Jeb! in 2016, like most people were expecting, that all the old narratives and trust in the corporate media would have continued as it had? There would have been almost no passion for either of those two and the race would have been pretty boring and controlled. And the talking heads on the news wouldn’t have turned into such clowns. A guy like Don Lemon could have easily maintained his professional on-air composure over HRC vs. Jeb!
Then say in the HRC/Jeb! world, after HRC wins, they launch Covid. How would patriots be able to counter those narratives when almost everyone still fully believes in the news? Patriots wouldn’t have anything super obvious to point to that would easily discredit the media. And there would be no MAGA leadership, so who would patriots unite under? Jeb? There wouldn’t even be a concept to unite under, like America First.
Other issues that Trump introduced, like trade with China and the open border with Mexico, weren’t even part of the conversation before Trump. And Trump was the one who called Climate Change a hoax too. Before that, conservatives were almost totally on board with climate change. I remember Rand Paul on Bill Maher’s show and Maher had him totally on the defensive about climate change. It was Trump who pinned it on China to force the Democrats on the defense on climate change.
It makes sense to do all this in order to gain the trust of people like us. Let us be aware of the current darkness in the world so when somebody comes in and promises their version of light, we will follow. What if their version of light is simply a greater form of darkness? I hope it is not true, but it makes sense as a viable option.
It seems like a pretty insane strategy to me. How many people are closer to submission to the globalist agenda before Trump and after Trump?
Doesn’t it seem like if they had done HRC vs. Jeb! in 2016, like most people were expecting, that all the old narratives and trust in the corporate media would have continued as it had? There would have been almost no passion for either of those two and the race would have been pretty boring and controlled. And the talking heads on the news wouldn’t have turned into such clowns. A guy like Don Lemon could have easily maintained his professional on-air composure over HRC vs. Jeb!
Then say in the HRC/Jeb! world, after HRC wins, they launch Covid. How would patriots be able to counter those narratives when almost everyone still fully believes in the news? Patriots wouldn’t have anything super obvious to point to that would easily discredit the media. And there would be no MAGA leadership, so who would patriots unite under? Jeb? There wouldn’t even be a concept to unite under, like America First.
Other issues that Trump introduced, like trade with China and the open border with Mexico, weren’t even part of the conversation before Trump. And Trump was the one who called Climate Change a hoax too. Before that, conservatives were almost totally on board with climate change. I remember Rand Paul on Bill Maher’s show and Maher had him totally on the defensive about climate change. It was Trump who pinned it on China to force the Democrats on the defense on climate change.