Anons research, use logic, evaluate, use expanded thinking and do not engage overly with emotional reaction.
- This is the logo for the APEC CEO summit for ONE year, hosted by THAILAND. It is NOT a WEF logo, or the logo of any permanent organization.
APEC = Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
- It is a logo developed by Thailand for THEIR hosting event. Each nation hosting APEC develops a unique logo, often one that reflect and highlights their cultural heritage. (Note the logos used by Peru, Papua New Guinea, Malaysia, New Zealand)
Philippines APEC CEO Summit logo (2016)
Peru APEC CEO Summit logo (2016)
Viet Nam APEC CEO Summit logo (2017)
Papua New Guinea APEC CEO Summit logo (2018)
Chile APEC CEO Summit logo (2019)
Malaysia APEC CEO Summit logo (2020)
New Zealand APEC CEO Summit logo (2021)
Now in context:
Thailand APEC CEO Summit logo (2022)
Note the many other iterations on the broad backdrop of what appears to be a very thailand-ish motif.
Also:
Thai Folk Art
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/thai-folk-art-pattern-flower-shape-647023225
Some more Thai design/imagery
This logo will no longer be used after the summit is finished. Next year, the APEC CEO Summit will have a new logo. APEC CEO SUmmit 2023 is scheduled to be held...... in the USA.
While we know that the Cabal behind the WEF has worked to infiltrate all institutions, and we can be confident that APEC is one of those, it seems to me that it's an irrational leap to somehow conflate the logo for the APEC 2022 CEO summit with some new symbol Klaus Schwab is establishing. Maybe, but its a big leap and far more likely simply the expression of ignorance on the part of Westerners who don't really know anything about the history and culture of the East or of Thailand itself.
While the USA 2023 Summit logo does have echos of the swastika, over-estimation of the impact of this (it's a temporary EVENT logo that will be shelved the following year) combined with a lack of research and context, a smattering of ignorance, fueled by emotional leaps - this approach really does NOT serve the Q agenda, imo.
By the way, here's a few neat pics of your favorite President addressing the APEC CEO Summit in Vietnam, 2017.
I have to admit, I have a bias. I tend to see such emotionally charged conclusions (as expressed by some of the commentators in the original post) by a lot of pedes to be less than diligent in the application of Q's principles.
I guess all anons are different, but I do think (my opinion) that some anons place WAY too much emphasis on the symbolism factor, to the extent that they see the symbols everywhere, I mean everywhere. And, I think that can be counter-productive.
But possibly, its just one area that doesn't resonate with my thinking, and I'm wrong or don't see the connections. In my stock and trade, context is CRITICAL to evaluating ANY meaning, and I think sometimes meaning that isn't there can be extracted because the observer isn't taking sufficient notice or isn't sufficiently contextualizing the information.
Agree generally. We could make some formula for it.
requisite attention = (probability of signal vs noise) * (impact if true)
Both variables are low here, so imo, low attention is called for. The symbol is likely benign and even if not, its low impact because we already know Klaus is a baddie.
But I do think it's good to avoid mistakenly assigning a zero value to things like this. Requisite attention is nonzero here, but still very low, imo.
Hmmmm.... That's interesting.
Application of this sort of approach seems solid. What got me, however, was folks saying that Schwab was releasing the new NWO symbol! I mean, that's just ....
If the issue could be raised, discussed and looked at without all the noise, then it would be productive and certainly valuable. No problem is questioning, in that case.
Agreed.
However, one thing I am constantly concerned about is the signal vs noise ratio WITHIN the Great Awakening, such as what manifests on this board, in any given post, or on Telegram, or elsewhere. The more noise, the less signal for normies to pick up and benefit from, and less signal for anons to build the information victory with.
So when someone goes off emotionally charged, misapplying logic or reasoning, and all sort of noise ideas are generated and then promulgated, that's a problem. I think anons would do well to consider limiting that sort of phenomenon to be a central part of our work.
I could talk for hours about this subject. This is an extremely important spiritual consideration that anons in particular need to be aware of.
In short, we err by either not thinking for ourselves about an issue (normies), or we err by thinking about an issue then becoming emotionally invested in our theory because it's "ours" and we're special. The former is a Satanic bias, the latter a Luciferic bias. Sounds scary, but it's not. We're all influenced by many spirits (concepts).
Hope I didn't get too weird on you there. Lol :)
Not at all. I like the way you think. This sort of stuff is totally in my wheelhouse!
I've not thought too much on the distinctions between 'satanic' and 'luciferian', but I think your description of the two biases illuminates (woaaah.....?) (kek) some interesting dimensions.
Identifying the traits of either or both of these is a critical aspect of engaging in spiritual work. It resonates with a very powerful paradigm I've used for decades: drawing a distinction between 'fallen nature' and 'original nature', or fallen mind and original mind.
If one sees the original nature/mind as sourced from the Creator - aka what we are endowed with as God's creation - and fallen nature/mind as being sourced from the fallen angel, one begins to identify just how we are manipulated by fallen nature and the process of separation of good and evil within ourselves can begin on a conscious level.
The idea here is that fallen nature was inherited from the fallen angel, Lucifer, who fell to become Satan, by Adam and Eve through the process of establishing a relationship with him (expressed in scripture as the eating of the fruit).
Thus, each man is a fusion of Adamic nature and Angelic nature. Adamic nature is inherent, original and natural to us, but angelic nature is foreign. The two need to be identified and separated.
How did Lucifer fall to become Satan? After all, Lucifer was a good, pure being created by God. Lucifer's problem started with an arrogance that overemphasized the intellectual understanding he had. He thought he was the smartest, and as far as Angels go, he was, but Adam was created not only with intelligence, but with heart, to be able to love as God loves.
Lucifer looked at Adam and saw a young dolt, an upstart. Lucifer had labored with God for millenia in designing, creating and then overseeing the running of the universe. Then, God creates Adam, and purposed to give ALL of that to Adam. Lucifer began to feel jealous of the love that Adam received from God, which was greater in bandwidth and greater in intensity than what Lucifer received from God.
Lucifer should have seen Adam, and loved Adam recognizing that Adam was not only the purpose of God creating the universe, but also the purpose of Lucifer's creation. As God's son, Adam was to be the master (and, a master of love, eventually) to Lucifer.
So, without going into more detail, Lucifer developed 4 fallen natures: he failed to see Adam from God's viewpoint. Next, he failed to keep his rightful position in relation to Adam, to keep Adam as his (eventual) governor. Then, Lucifer reversed the roles with Adam, and attempted to control and dominate Adam instead of letting himself be governed by Adam. Finally, Lucifer multiplied his corrupted perspective and behavior by tempting Eve in order to destroy Adam through Eve. He multiplied his sin, instead of repenting and reversing.
These are the four fallen natures we can see play out in humanity: not seeing things from God's perspective, not keeping one's rightful position, reversing the order of governance/dominion, and multiplying our sin.
Conversely, our original nature pushes us to see things from God's viewpoint. (we should love the things that God loves, and desire the things that God desires.) It pushes us to keep our rightful position in relation to others, including God, including Christ, but also in normal relationships. It pushes us to maintain the correct order of governance, and it pushes us to multiply goodness and curb our sin.
When the government sees the population as something to dominate and control,when it leaves its correct position of being servant to the population, when it rises above the population and attempts to (or actually does) put itself in the position to dominate and coerce the people, and then multiples the corruption by tempting others into that vortex of corruption and unprincipled action, it is simply exhibiting the fallen nature of the fallen angel, and is in fact repeating the Fall of Man on the national level, standing in the position of a fallen archangel.
kek. Did I get too weird? Anyway, I like the way you think, fren. wwg1wga.