If you consider yourself 'Awakened', you should be familiar with this pending SCOTUS case. - The Great Awakening

331

If you consider yourself 'Awakened', you should be familiar with this pending SCOTUS case. (americanmediaperiscope.com)

posted 2 years ago by Swervish 2 years ago by Swervish +333 / -2

137 comments

137 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (137)

sorted by:

▲ 5 ▼

– TheWestDeclines 5 points 1 year ago +9 / -4

If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. This isn't even hitting any blogs because it's likely garbage. There are plenty of lawfags who could step up here to trumpet what this is, and, better, the chances of it being anything at all. No one is stepping up. Why? Likely because it's crap. Again.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 8 ▼

– Swervish [S] 8 points 1 year ago +10 / -2

I suspect youre right, but lets face it; We have NO IDEA what the plan is.

NO FUCKING IDEA

Weve been guessing and datefagging and decoding for 5 years now.

And we have ___ ___________ ______

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– TheWestDeclines 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

I'd be able to trust a plan much better if I knew a bit more about it and saw some actual evidence that the plan was being implemented. At some point Q said that only 20% would be made public, but then Q changed that to 40% being made public. (Correct me if I'm wrong here.) So, question this is: Where's the 40%? Because, by my estimate, we've seen around 2% being made public. Go to Reddit, one of the most popular forums in the world, and post on /politics what you really think and believe about Trump, then report back here to us what your experience is.

Great Awakening? Sure, for a good minority. But we're far far far from done.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q