If you consider yourself 'Awakened', you should be familiar with this pending SCOTUS case.
(americanmediaperiscope.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. This isn't even hitting any blogs because it's likely garbage. There are plenty of lawfags who could step up here to trumpet what this is, and, better, the chances of it being anything at all. No one is stepping up. Why? Likely because it's crap. Again.
I suspect youre right, but lets face it; We have NO IDEA what the plan is.
NO FUCKING IDEA
Weve been guessing and datefagging and decoding for 5 years now.
And we have ___ ___________ ______
Trying to fill in the blanks... I'm guessing it's December 12th, 2022!
/s
I'd like to solve the puzzle.
Yep. I mean, we have ideas, actually, but they are basically ideas.
What we DO have is a clear knowledge of what WE need to do, and HOW to do it. We've been honing our skills for 5 years.
When the time hits, we'll be ready steady.
I'd be able to trust a plan much better if I knew a bit more about it and saw some actual evidence that the plan was being implemented. At some point Q said that only 20% would be made public, but then Q changed that to 40% being made public. (Correct me if I'm wrong here.) So, question this is: Where's the 40%? Because, by my estimate, we've seen around 2% being made public. Go to Reddit, one of the most popular forums in the world, and post on /politics what you really think and believe about Trump, then report back here to us what your experience is.
Great Awakening? Sure, for a good minority. But we're far far far from done.
There are very few lawfags here that I know of... Simonsays and WinsAnon being the only two I can recall. 😔
I feel like I haven’t seen WinsAnon on here in forever. Then again, I haven’t been on very much lately so maybe that’s why. 🤷🏼♀️😬
Lawfag here - the SCOTUS will not grant cert on this case, do not hit the hopium.
and you know this how. SCOTUS grants small % for sure but you can't know
I'm an attorney. I looked at some of the procedural history and, while I have not made an exhaustive search, I have read a few of the rulings in this case.
On January 6, 2022 this case was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court ruled that he did not have standing, and that the government has not waived sovereign immunity.
Brunson appealed this ruling, and the answer stayed the same. The most recent ruling was this month actually.
Looks like a nothingburger.
I will happily look more into it if anyone can point to something to the contrary. But this is why I don't trust these blogs. The last point especially in the blog, that "If the justices don't vote in favor, they may be charged with treason" is especially ridiculous. Absolute fantasyland.
Last, there is nothing to suggest that SCOTUS will accept cert in this case. Extremely unlikely.
Thanks, lawfagAnon. I rest my case. More smoke being blown up our collective asses.
u/simon_says hopefully will have something to say about it!
Military being the only way means we will suffer incalculable loss and failure, especially at the highest levels like the SCOTUS. Aside from some small achievements, comparatively, the memory hole contains infinite nothing burgers and empty promises.