Anons we’ve had plenty of posts on the upcoming Supreme Court Case 22-380. People have been posting on why it’s important, will it fly or not fly. Well Juan O’Savin brings up one of the best discussions really coming to a head or the point starting at 12min in and reaches the mountain top point at 14ish, finishing gloriously at 18min!! But hearing the 2-3 min leading up is so important for context! See the linked Rumble video below. Anyway I’ve read the entire case, and listened carefully to Juan, and of course every one of his videos spanning near 2 years.
But in this video Juan seriously gets to the point of why this case is being taken up and why it’s soooooo important to the Supreme Court!! Pay attention please.
To summarize, the Lame-Duck Congress or even new Congress is per plan, the heads of the parties (Juan does not name but I Am) Shumer, McConnel and McCarthy, are going all in on “de-fanging” the Supreme Court for Roe vs Wade and other lesser decisions or Future decisions by: removing their “lifetime appointments”, “packing the court”, and other sneaky legislation to neuter their 3rd Branch powers. All of The Legislative Pieces To De-Fang them are already set to be voted on by committees and main houses! It’s already to go and the Supreme Court now has wind of all this!
So, what do they do?! Toss the case? Let the legislative moves happen then fight it later, going up against TWO Known Compromised Branches? Or do they take the defensive to save their Constitutional duty, and take Theeee Only Chance they have before ANY Of The Pieces of Cabal legislation can be heard, and obliterate all of the treason, killing two Birds with ONE STONE! David vs Goliath!! THIS Is BIBLICAL!!
Am I making Sense from Juan? Of course he is also extremely clear once he gets into this piece. And holy crap is it that ONE Chance to get it right! Just One Chance for Freedom!
So if they: toss the case, it’ll be seen as failure to defend Constitution. Legislations will take place and they’ll be pretty much neutered, packed, term limited, Years Of Legal Battles after while Biden destroys America fully.
If they take it and uphold case; they will need to use the US Marshals or military to remove treasonous parties, to install correct politicians once military sorts it out, or Put In Rightful President and have new elections. If This Happens, here is where I see the Democrats and RINOs joining to RHEEEEE, Death of America! The DemoLibs and media would flip completely out and rage as they go down in the greatest RRRHHHEEEEE Storm ever!
The Econ will collapse, but all the info/data on elections will FLOOD out! The Plan! This will also reverse ALL LEGISLATIVE Pieces and VOTING all the way back before the 2020 Election! VOIDING ALL Federal Stuff the last 6 years in One Blow!! And the Supreme Court saves itself, the Constitution, and Republic in one TOTALLY LEGAL CASE and move. CHECKMATE! And Trump did nothing on its face to make it happen! 4 Trumpet Players from Utah did, and brought down Jericho’s walls! It’s could be truly that Biblical moment!
Will there be legal fights, heck yes and all sorts of turmoil, but it’ll be quickly squashed because The Military Will by law be dictating what goes on until shit gets straightened out period.
Will this happen?! That is thee trillion dollar question only the Supreme Court can answer. God give us all strength and the glory to see what ever unfolds through. Because no matter what, Where We Go One We Go All, together.
https://americanmediaperiscope.com/the-supreme-court-petition-set-to-rock-america/
I have a sincere question regarding the Brunson case. Didn't SCOTUS already reject this on 2 occasions? And perhaps a more important question regarding the validity of the Brunson case is reported by TGP:
Conservative Treehouse opines that by eliminating the motions from the records of the House, they could certify the fraud with no detractors on record and give SCOTUS a reason to claim that cases before it lacked standing.
In order to prevent those two motions, the Speaker of the House, the Minority Leaders, and the President of the Congress (VP Pence) could not be PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.
This allowed Speaker Pelosi to suspend the Congress UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. The crisis invoked emergency procedures and Pelosi was able to prevent the delay of certification herself.
When Congress returned later that night, Pelosi was in charge:
The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!…
…it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities.
But how did Pence know this ahead of time so that he could clarify it in his statement that he released while President Trump was still talking?
This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.
IT pretty much explains why people were ushered up to the capital and then invited into the capital building. In stating this, SCOTUS might have only the option to consider this legalistically. An emergency was indeed invoked, but fraudulently. Doesn't the fraud have to be exposed first in order to to declare the emergency rules null and void?
Another question is -- Did the minority leader, Kevin McCarthy know? Evidently, he left the chamber too.
I’ve commented ad nauseam on this Brunson case. It’s bad on so many levels. I am happy to explain if you want, or you can read my post history. This case wasn’t your particular question.
Congress can make its own rules. SCOTUS cannot interfere in 99.999999% of congressional rule disputes. If Congress tries to pass enhanced eligibility requirements beyond the constitution, for example, scotus can take that case. But most other disputes related to how that body conducts business are off limits as separation of powers. Similarly, Congress can’t tell SCOTUS who can practice law in federal courts - that is SCOTUS’ domain how to run their branch.
The fact that either legislative body did not abide by their own rules is not usually a basis to have the courts weigh in. In some circumstances, yes, but that typically involves a third party with some interest that brings the suit.
So while I love the treehouse and Sundance, there was no legal basis for them to “need” an “emergency” on this front. There was a political basis. But not legal. They could simply ignore their rule and move on to what they did. Except they’d have to explain why they did that to their constituents. It would have probably gone poorly.
How come nobody is asking all the dillholes who had pledged to vote against the problem state electors but then changed their minds after Jan 6 why 2 hours of guided tours somehow changed the fact that there was fraud in those states elections? Even if it was muh inciting erections, how does that alter the fraud element such that it is overlooked? That is what all those fools need to be ambushed with on camera.
You should post this in its own separate new thread so Anons can discuss it.